Bring Back 128 Player Breakthrough
Conquest in 2042 is boring. I spend more time running around the map looking for fights compared to actually having gunfights. With 128 players breakthrough was chaotic, but there was never a dull mo...
Forum Discussion
Instead of y'all just summarily removing it. Was this even based on feedback, or is this "design-by-metrics" nonsense?
Why not ask players before making such a major change to one of the key selling points?
We want specialists gone, not 128p breakthrough.
@edgecrusherO0 if I remember correctly, after the map feedback loop they mentioned trying to focus on 64 BT going forward. I don't recall them stating cutting off the old mode though, but that new maps would/could be focused on a tighter map size.
- @Anobix https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Discussion/Core-Feedback-Maps-Next-Steps-Discussion-Thread/td-p/11395332
Not mentioned in the OP, the only mention of 64 players is in the asterisks at the bottom denoting that last-gen is locked at 64p.@edgecrusherO0Thanks, I could have sworn I read it somewhere. Maybe it was leading into the 'core feedback' prior to the post/availability to reply? I'll have to go searching, but I'm almost positive some part of it mentioned player count with breakthrough.
Found it -- https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-2042/community/battlefield-core-feedback-maps-kick-off
- @Anobix Man, them talking about feedback...legit, where was teh feedback asking to remove 128p and focus on 64p. I've never seen that anywhere, at least not in any meaningful numbers vs. one person saying it and most others disagreeing.
Feels like DICE admitting defeat and acknowledging they can't hack it.
