We got good potential battlefield, which is now unfortunatly all *, BUT I'm not going to give up. FIX THE GAME and make it to be a playable!! There is only good FPS shooter which was Battlefield, please don't mess this up.
Vote this up if you agree with me. Thank you!
To be fair, none of those games you listed play like each other. I'm enjoying the game when it works even with the differences so I'm hoping they can fix the technical and balance issues relatively quickly and not take 6 months to get the game into a playable state.
I think the big problem is once again the marketing.
2042 whas marketet as a spritual successor to BF3/BF4 with classic "Battlefield Moments" in the trailers and promos.
Giving us the expectation that it would be the classic Battlefield gameplay on a larger scale.
Instead imagine if it where marketed as a spin-off game like Hardline or Bad Company the expectation would be totaly different and player would accept the gameplay for what it's designed for.
And the feeling is that is what it whas originaly designed to be ,"Battlefield: Hazard Zone", but maybe on the way it did not pan out as they planed, paniced and jammed conquest and breakthrough into it.
@punishertrd wrote:
@Noodlesocksthe thing is they were all BF this game isnt even close to being one. it feels like an old mans COD but kinda worse
The thing is you aren't saying anything that wasn't said about Battlefield 3. Both Battlefield and Call of Duty has changed drastically over the past two decades. It's one thing to dislike those changes; if you don't have fun with the game because of them then fine but to denigrate the game through comparisons with other (and more successful) games is a vapid, irrelevant critique.
