Well that's the thing, I had expected it to do more damage per bullet given it's low fire rate and poor projectile velocity, but it's a four to five shot kill with it's 550 RPM, which means you will be outclassed at pretty much any range, especially when you are closer to your target.
I don't think it's a bug that it's damage model is the way that it is. It feels to me that it's a copy and paste of the M5A3's, I just think it's a big touch of laziness.
It's attachments also seem a bit dodgy, the extended magazines don't mention a decrease to reload speed for example yet every other extended magazine attachment usually does this.
I wouldn't mind it's current handling and difficulty to control, if it had the firepower to match how much it kicks and jumps around, but it doesn't...
In my mind, it should be a weapon that can oppress from medium to long ranges, favouring bipod usage; but it lacks the damage model for that at the moment.
Very nice post and I don't really have to add anything to it. The weapons feel slow and stiff and like OP said when bringing them into 2042 they need to fit into 2042 and not BF3.
