DICE Team
@A_Cool_Gorilla That's why if you're tired with this system and you wanted to optimize your loadouts to the fullest extent then Battlefield isn't for you since there are many game that is similar to Battlefield that let's you optimize your loadouts to the fullest extent like the incoming MWII ground war is coming back and it let's you optimize your loadouts to the fullest extent there's also WW3 game that allows you to do that also
@A_Cool_Gorilla That's why I recommend you to play WW3 since that game is basically like Battlefield but with the hybrid system that you wanted plus the gadget also creates teamwork in that game, Let Battlefield be a Battlefield game simple as that.
@A_Cool_Gorilla wrote:
@UnKnOwn_1628042WW3 doesn't have air combat, nor does it have the polish that a AAA game can offer.
Besides, I'd rather see Battlefield evolve. The Frostbite Battlefields that we have now are nothing like the Refactor titles, and I see class removal as the next big innovation for the franchise.
Yeah sure cause all this "evolving" away from BF core components (like classes) has just worked super so far eh?
It would work great in a game that's properly balanced. I wouldn't judge it on BF2042, given the rough state that it's in.
@A_Cool_GorillaAnd there's a good point, it would work in A game, doesn't mean it should be in battlefield. Do you think it would work in BF3/4? This is a legitimate question BTW, not a jab.
@A_Cool_Gorilla Removing the class system isn't a big innovation but instead it removes it the core gameplay foundation of Battlefield, This is one of the components of what makes Battlefield a Battlefield game, Us the players play Battlefield for the classes not some open loadout Call of Duty copy game
