DICE Team
@DuaneDibbley wrote:
@Ironhead841
Hey, what do you want, Honestly. He replied to us after say 4 days of asking. That is better than nothing and what those guys at Dice call 'improved communication'.
Serious question - I'm ok with constructive feedback or you sharing your displeasure for anything related to the game. But why do you expect myself or others to engage with such passive aggressive comments?
@Straatford87 wrote:
@DuaneDibbley wrote:
@Ironhead841
Hey, what do you want, Honestly. He replied to us after say 4 days of asking. That is better than nothing and what those guys at Dice call 'improved communication'.Serious question - I'm ok with constructive feedback or you sharing your displeasure for anything related to the game. But why do you expect myself or others to engage with such passive aggressive comments?
Now you are here, could you write what about Server browser in AoW looks like? I think a lot of people are waiting for anyone from Dice to answer this.
Hmmm....
After many months of having a game that doesn't work properly?
After many months asking for a server browser?
After many months playing half finished maps?
After many months shooting marshmallows and feathers?
After many months wondering if your system( pc/console) is good enough?
After many months waiting for a fix that looks like fixing the last fix?
After many months kept in de dark?...yes then people like me and others may throw some Passive aggressive comments.
Why?...we all are Battlefield fans..some longer then others, but we fell in love with this franchise.
This game doesn't feel like a BF game for me....it can be...but it already takes too long.
Exposure was a step in the right direction, but with all the stuff missing is hard to finish a round,
All in all we just wanna play and have some info and answers on a weekly basis maybe.
@Straatford87 can you address one simple question, this is neither passive nor aggressive:
Is a Server Browser being considered for AOW?
[ YES ] [ NO ]
@Adamonic wrote:@Straatford87 can you address one simple question, this is neither passive nor aggressive:
Is a Server Browser being considered for AOW?
[ YES ] [ NO ]
Considered is such a loaded word! I'm sure it has been 'considered' at some point past or present... lol
@Straatford87 wrote:
@DuaneDibbley wrote:
@Ironhead841
Hey, what do you want, Honestly. He replied to us after say 4 days of asking. That is better than nothing and what those guys at Dice call 'improved communication'.Serious question - I'm ok with constructive feedback or you sharing your displeasure for anything related to the game. But why do you expect myself or others to engage with such passive aggressive comments?
Because you replied to passive aggressive post. What conclusion we do here - you respond to such post rather than to constructive feedback and posts which are not passive aggressive. Show community the other way around. Engage more on constructive topics. For now the only way to bring your attention is either rules violation or being way too aggressive. Feel free to disagree but this is what I see from my point of view. Yours might be different.
@Straatford87Thanks Straatford.
We get it, everyone's a critic currently - though you know we have our reasons, and likewise we should understand not needing to butcher EA people when they actually respond.
It's critical because we're severely lacking response. We're neglected; send us some help?
We need an answer about persistent servers / a server browser. That thread is reaching 2,000 posts, and we're riling each other up to antagonism due to this neglect.
Can you inform us on this matter, and likewise inform EA of a server browsers necessity - "so says the community"?
