Forum Discussion
12 Replies
- S3SSioN_SoL1 year agoSeasoned Ace@80uwjx4m1chc Live service in a nutshell. I don't like it either.
Whats even more sad is that the stadium is being called a "new map". I look forward to playing it, but I was more excited to hear about 2 new maps. I was hoping for a 128 map before they don't get made anymore.
It should technically be released right now with haven. Then a second new map in May.
- CPU_UK1 year agoSeasoned Ace@80uwjx4m1chc I think it comes with 7.2, which means it's not even the next one after the main drop.
I guess they have to drag it out to October 2025 - ATFGunr1 year agoLegend@CPU_UK You’ve hit the nail on the head, this is about stretching content as long as possible. It looks good on paper. Maybe lines up with a free to play connection to a console or EA App that will be timed around then. They have a method to their madness, player satisfaction not being on that list of course.
- GrizzGolf1 year agoSeasoned Ace
@D-Man3847 wrote:Whats even more sad is that the stadium is being called a "new map". I look forward to playing it, but I was more excited to hear about 2 new maps. I was hoping for a 128 map before they don't get made anymore.
It should technically be released right now with haven. Then a second new map in May.
I think they said at some point like a year ago they were done making 128 maps. - Anobix1 year agoSeasoned Ace
@GrizzGolf wrote:
@D-Man3847 wrote:Whats even more sad is that the stadium is being called a "new map". I look forward to playing it, but I was more excited to hear about 2 new maps. I was hoping for a 128 map before they don't get made anymore.
It should technically be released right now with haven. Then a second new map in May.
I think they said at some point like a year ago they were done making 128 maps.Yep that sounds right, especially with breakthrough I know they killed any possibilities of 128 and then shortly thereafter stopped separate dev on 128 new maps, probably a hell of a lot easier to make for both gens of devices.
- CPU_UK1 year agoSeasoned Ace
Why was 96 players never considered an option?
- Anobix1 year agoSeasoned Ace@CPU_UK I imagine because 64 has long-been the standard player count of most battlefield's and it was easier for them to just double the count instead of adding by 50%.
Maybe 96 would have a better feel to it, but honestly no matter the player count (16v16, 32v32, 50v50, 64v64, etc) the maps and gameplay design and flow are all incredibly important for have everything feel smooth/right. It doesn't matter how good the gunplay is if the maps are just open fields or hills, and similarly you can have perfect/nostalgia-filled maps, but it doesn't help if the gunplay and balance isn't there. - sk1lld1 year agoLegend
I was hoping that the stadium map would release with season 7 but it's fine if it comes later imho.
- VOLBANKER_PC1 year agoSeasoned Ace
@sk1lldI’m also okay with stadium map coming later in the season.
Tbh I prefer getting one new map at a time instead of 4 as back in the days with DLC’s. That means everybody’s focus is on playing that same map instead of bring spread over 4 different maps.Edit:
Btw. I think the stadium map will rock!!!