Question for the community :)
What has 2042 done better than past battlefield titles. I say give credit where credit is due and if not well let's hear that too ☺️ Credit to the weapon plus system I think that is a cool innovati...
Forum Discussion
@SCUBASTEVE120 Months ago it was better than BF3 and 4. Freedom of kit, various effective weapons, decent maps. Now it's been neutered for the noobs, the vehicle children. Worse than 3 and 4.
@DPsx7 I mean everyone has the right to their opinions ☺️ 2042 should've always had classes (real classes not like the ones in 2042) without classes it's too much like all other fps games. I don't think there ever was a point when 2042 was better or will ever be better than bf3 or bf4. Map design has been poor from the start with little improvement with reworks. And game has been out 1.5 years and we have only got 4 new maps and no new portal maps.
- @SCUBASTEVE120 you shouldn't have said that to sx7....
well time for another delairlment of a topic....- @X-Sunslayer-X Just simply my opinion as is the entire topic plus I just want to hear some reasons as to why people like 2042 cause most people bash on it for it's flaws (myself included)
- @SCUBASTEVE120 i was not reffering to you with that warning/foreshadowing.....
- @SCUBASTEVE120 How though? They do not make a difference and the flexibility from ditching them was an improvement. The BF experience comes from the game modes, big maps, infantry vs vehicles. Not some lame old mechanic from previous games.
2042 had lots of promise, that's gone now. It never had a chance because it was only a year old before it was crippled, compared to games that were allowed to grow for several years.
I blame the lack of DLC on the trolls. They begged for nerfs which take time. They cried about the launch maps (which were fine) causing the devs to remake them instead of focus on new content.
