Remove the drone like you did with the shield

@GosBikerI think they should remove the tanks. To give egual opportunity to infantry.

Its unfair that players can hide inside that moving fortress. The "sit in a tank exploit" is simply unfair

Just blanket the area with smoke. Adapt and overcome.

@BizzyVaping 

Infantry has equal opportunity. There is Soflam and every single time a tank comes in, you have atleast 5 to 6 infantry men trying to take it out.

You can't be expecting to 1v1 a tank or helicopter. 

Battlefield has always been a game where both infantry and vehicle gameplay is important. 

But right now, it just seems like the casual players are all fully expecting to do a 1v1 a tank or heli and win it? 

What I am worried about is how tanks are now becoming like BFV (2nd worst Battlefield game ever) tanks. They have to sit all the way back and just spam 1, hoping to hit. 

Remember those BFBC2 or BF3 days, where once a tank is destroying infantry, infantry players actually re-deploy to equip the RPG and literally do crazy stunts to get that tank destroyed. What happened to all those play styles?

All of my observations are based on Breakthrough game mode, not conquest. It is very important you understand that Breakthrough playable area is cramped with a total of 128 players, meaning the number of AA missiles and Recoiless M5 is insane, along with the Soflams, prox scanners. To top it off, AA is broken, it literally lets you fire a shot instantly after your first lock. 

I would like vehicle gameplay to be back, and as an infantry, I would like to have a fair chance to work with a bunch of guys to take out any tanks.

That stupid hovercraft should not even be in the game, I have really no clue what is its purpose other than to run people over? 

He didn't. He said the casual player is the one who expects to be able to take out tanks and choppers on their own with ease.

Though I suspect it's a mix of casual players and regular infantry players who just hate playing against offensive vehicles and would be happy if the game made it easy for them to take out on their own.

DICE chose to instead make the Drone more easy to see and hit on update #3

This should enable the soldiers to protect their tanks from drones without removing the option to do the c5 trick if the other team's guard is down.

I think it is more reasonable a fix than just disabling the c5 sticking.

Even now it is really rare for anyone to do this to me with a drone. Less than 1 time per day. Some times I even saw the drone and outrun it into safety

I'll say it's fair when you let me deploy a squad's worth of Irish's weapon shoot down system on my vehicle and drive around protected by it. But they don't allow that, because it would be ridiculous.

Yet when an infantry players complains about Vehicles being Overpowered it's

Yet when Vehicles kill 20 - 30 infantry without having to even get out to repair it's "Oh my God its super balanced perfect don't change it"

The only sad thing about this is a an Actual Anti-Tank Missile is so insanely useless in comparison. 

@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:

DICE chose to instead make the Drone more easy to see and hit on update #3

This should enable the soldiers to protect their tanks from drones without removing the option to do the c5 trick if the other team's guard is down.

I think it is more reasonable a fix than just disabling the c5 sticking.

Even now it is really rare for anyone to do this to me with a drone. Less than 1 time per day. Some times I even saw the drone and outrun it into safety

I've got the silver badges for both tanks so I've played them quite a bit both in Conquest and Breakthrough. It's really rare in Conquest, like hardly ever. But in Breakthrough you might have six or seven people at a time with C5 drones in the air and they know exactly where you'll be on the map so it happens regularly.