Forum Discussion

Adamonic's avatar
Adamonic
Legend
3 years ago
Solved

Season 2 a huge success (or not) compared to S1

I am surprised this is not getting much attention, but Season 2 beat Season 1's launch! Now that we are through the first week of Season 2, we can use Steam Charts to get an idea of how many additio...
discussion
  • Spinner1981's avatar
    Spinner1981
    3 years ago
    @CyberDyme if they got rid of specialists (i know they wont) and brought back classes with restricted weapons and gadgets, hurried and released the rest of the renewed launch maps sooner rather than later, and added more destruction across all launch and new maps, it could be so much more (but obvs still not on par with say BF 4).

    But alas, for some crazy reason the above won't happen. Which is a shame. With the above mentioned, this alone would make 2042 sooo much better and most likely bring back more players.
Echo6Echo's avatar
Echo6Echo
3 years ago
@mrtwotimes wrote:

That's nice and all but all I really need is 128 available players, or at least enough to start a battle ... which I do not have any issue with. 

I have no ownership in EA or the BF franchise so numbers like that don't mean much to me.

What it means to you is that you can't have more than a few choices in AoW and NO server browser because they don't want to add the expense or split the player base too far to where it's impossible to get a game in AoW. Also, no money for enhancements, etc. It's all symbiotic...

Prof3ss0r_M1k3's avatar
Prof3ss0r_M1k3
3 years ago
@Echo6Echo it's not an expense thing for server browser. they can't afford to have the real numbers come out. if we have a browser we will know EXACTLY how many people are playing

About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion

Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,972 PostsLatest Activity: 29 days ago