Tanks are glass. Helicopters are OP
A tank is no longer a viable option to charge into the battlefield. People complained that tanks would sit back. Now it's a necessity, because 1 player can't disable a tank. Helicopters get fire from...
Forum Discussion
Having an advantage of firepower and armor is the very thing that defines a "tank" isn't it?
As a former tanker, who is now a ground pounder for the most part, I think tanks are pretty useless in their current form, I barely give them a thought.
Infantry should fear a tank rolling in but right now they have little to no impact on the battlefield in Conquest if the opposing team even has an iota of intelligence or commonsense.
And in Breakthrough they are completely worthless because they know they never have to leave their home base to farm kills hunkered down behind Irish's sentinels and there is nothing that can be done about it.
Tanks vs. infantry should be one-sided because well it's a TANK, lol.
@Ironhead841 wrote:Having an advantage of firepower and armor is the very thing that defines a "tank" isn't it?
Nope. Not sure where youre getting your definitions
As a former tanker, who is now a ground pounder for the most part, I think tanks are pretty useless in their current form, I barely give them a thought.
Most pilots who looking for the advantage you described feel that way. It is because of your misinterpretation of the definition.
Infantry should fear a tank rolling in but right now they have little to no impact on the battlefield in Conquest if the opposing team even has an iota of intelligence or commonsense.
Only infantry without means to deal with it.
And in Breakthrough they are completely worthless because they know they never have to leave their home base to farm kills hunkered down behind Irish's sentinels and there is nothing that can be done about it.
These are * pilots.
Tanks vs. infantry should be one-sided because well it's a TANK, lol.
Im not sure where youre getting this info.
