The effect of C5 on ground vehiclesThe power of C5 seriously affects the survival of ground vehicles(tank)And the C5 throws too far away, more like a grenadeIn Battlefield 3,4 the throw of C4 is not farMy suggestion is to reduce the damage of C5and requires 4 C5s to destroy ground vehicles(tank)Carry 3 C5s by default, you need to find the ammo box to supply 1 C5By the way, please reduce the throwing distance of C5 if possible 🙂If you don't want to do this I suggest you delete the tank and mav🙂Replenish:But in Battlefield 2042, due to the expert characteristics and air transport aircraft, it can be airborne almost anytime, anywhere, which did not exist in the previous workYou can jam tanks and MAV with EMP grenadesAnd you throw C5s fastQuickly detonate C5 even if spottedEspecially the MAV to be honest it looks like a coffin

@-YJN- 3 c4 (c5 in this game) have always destroyed a vehicle. no changes needed. a conversation can be had about the distance they can be thrown (seems kinda far) but not the effectiveness of c5. if you allow someone to walk up to your tank and throw 3 c5 on it and have time to detonate then you get what you deserve

he does have a point thoit is much much easier to kills vehicles with c5 becouse there are more options on how you approach the vehicle.sundance and Mackay have the easiest part, the constant spawning from above inside the hind/condor, now also from the cram spawn beacon who serves as a team spawnpoint etc. It is defenitely easier to kill vehicles inn2042the question for a throwing distance nerf is justified, an angel can throw the arround like candys.

@Bolvard wrote:@Padding_Ur_Statsand still in the end I managed to destroy every vehicle when I saw an enemy tank doing well becouse i picked sundance c5 and waited for an openingWaited for an opening. Why wait if Sundance is so good? Youre wording this like it is a slam dunk. You do realize 3 C5 on the top of a tank doesn't destroy it now, right?But aside from that, in 2042 it is possible that every infantrysoldier you encounter has c5 so… yeahEvery Infrantry huh? How do you explain the plethora of ammo crates, spawn beacons, med crates, Recoils et al. Are people cheating and getting more then one gadget choice? Or are you spewing information to make it seem tanks are weak?without a doubt, groundvehicles have to deal with the 6th time amount of threats compared to older titles in 2042.C5, mines, Lis and recoil, are the only ground effects. That isn't 6 times. Lets examine each shall we 1: C5 - good range, once release cannot be steered, need 3 hits and then trigger. Must be placed in right areas, avoid dying throughout process. Vehicles moving decrease success rate of landing all 3 exponentially, especially if they turn. On average, 1/10 success. Increased success playing Sundance.2: Mines: once laid, a crap shoot. Odds increase in Rush. 3: Recoil: 4 hits needed. Cannot be steered.4: G-84: Limited Range. Lis lights up like a big target on screen. No agility in steering capacity. Fast moving vehicles outrun them. Vehicles with medium speed can avoid by turning and using obstruction. Cannot destroy a vehicle on its own. Needs teamwork.Especialy Liz… you just need 3 or 4 Liz players who are devoted to theyr task and you basically have banished groundvehicles for the enemy team.You mean..... dare I say it....... TEAMWORK! OMG how can BF have teamwork! I find it funny that when there are multiple vehicles on an objective farming ground, its teamwork, but when it is reverse and armor is the target GET THE NERF BAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ive been told ad nausea in similar discussion, use teamwork to destroy armor. Now, YOU DECRY teamwork as OP! Which is it please?C5 in 2042 should have the same throwing range like back in bf3.Bull pucky. The accuracy of said range is horrible. Unless of course, youre not moving. That seems more like bad strat then C5 range. I dont see a need for a nerf because you cannot find the W key.

no one is going to be chucking 3 C5 on you from a moving transport. i am absolutely against nerfing C5 on vehicles. next people will say AT mines are unfair and it should take 4 to kill a tank. there is nothing wrong with c5. you just need to have situational awareness

But it's a fact that tanks have poor survivability in many maps, and MAV can't be a good resurrection point for the squad.

The effect of C5 on ground vehicles

41 Replies

Prof3ss0r_M1k3
3 years ago
@-YJN- 3 c4 (c5 in this game) have always destroyed a vehicle. no changes needed. a conversation can be had about the distance they can be thrown (seems kinda far) but not the effectiveness of c5. if you allow someone to walk up to your tank and throw 3 c5 on it and have time to detonate then you get what you deserve
-YJN-
New Traveler
3 years ago
But in Battlefield 2042, due to the expert characteristics and air transport aircraft, it can be airborne almost anytime, anywhere, which did not exist in the previous work
Prof3ss0r_M1k3
3 years ago
no one is going to be chucking 3 C5 on you from a moving transport. i am absolutely against nerfing C5 on vehicles. next people will say AT mines are unfair and it should take 4 to kill a tank.
there is nothing wrong with c5. you just need to have situational awareness
FlibberMeister
Seasoned Ace
3 years ago
And Configurable in portal editor for admins that want to force different types of play.
-YJN-
New Traveler
3 years ago
But it's a fact that tanks have poor survivability in many maps, and MAV can't be a good resurrection point for the squad.
Prof3ss0r_M1k3
3 years ago
@-YJN- that isn't an excuse to nerf c5. c5 has *always* been a 3x kill on any vehicle
FlibberMeister
Seasoned Ace
3 years ago
@Prof3ss0r_M1k3 wrote:
@-YJN-that isn't an excuse to nerf c5. c5 has *always* been a 3x kill on any vehicle
I agree,
3 c4 is a deserved kill. So same with c5.

a spanner with a follow up on a rpg is also a good tactic.

but I agree, that the c5 distance if it’s to far could mean it’s hard for vehicles to defend against.
also, tanks on Bf4 had night vision. Which gave it a standing chance. So again, there might be some balance issues.

MM the whole enjoyment of fighting a tank is wearing it down and winning when all the odds are against you.

if it’s like, oh look a tank, boom. That’s just weak.
tanks need to be formidable, but at the same time not invincible.

and when I last played, tanks in 2042, drive like an electric vehicle which is just dumb. And where basically a little bit *. Especially as the gunner with limited view.
Padding_Ur_Stat
3 years ago
C5 is about the only effective ground deterrent and you want it removed.
3 C5 should blow up anything, and yet, I threw 3 on a tank yesterday, and it didnt destroy it.   Quit your complaining. You dont like C5 thrown at you. Try moving.   The greater majority of armor drives to a flag or location, parks and farms infantry.    You let one get to you, tough. Youre not supposed to be invulnerable.
Good pilots as always moving. Always turning. They increase the difficulty of destruction.   C5 is fine.
mrtwotimes
3 years ago
Not sure, but it can't be that bad because players are still throwing C5 around like it's growing on trees.
CloverDeuce
Seasoned Ace
3 years ago
@Padding_Ur_Stats Had the same thing happen yesterday. Got 3 C5 on a MAV, pulled the trigger and it took some damage and it and drove away. Got a Liz rocket on it, still didn't blow up, and then I was shot by it and killed.