Forum Discussion
UP_LordPlumber
3 years agoSeasoned Ace
@Stella_x_Sin I could argue that SMGs are not good beyond the medium range (40-50 meters). Alot of them have insane damage drop-off to 9 bullets to kill at medium range.
Some like PP29 sure have a good range, but that's because of low ROF. BF3/4 also had slow ROF, high-damage SMGs, and PDWs. K30 or MP9 or whatever the new SMG is are pretty much useless beyond extreme CQC.
in BF3 LMGs were used mostly because of the putrid suppression mechanics. Beyond that they we're inferior in every way. This is why from BF4 onward LMGs were mostly ARs with extra steps. MG4 and AWS send their regards.
ARs were "bad" at long range in previous games? Well, I rest my case since I think we've played different games.
Some like PP29 sure have a good range, but that's because of low ROF. BF3/4 also had slow ROF, high-damage SMGs, and PDWs. K30 or MP9 or whatever the new SMG is are pretty much useless beyond extreme CQC.
in BF3 LMGs were used mostly because of the putrid suppression mechanics. Beyond that they we're inferior in every way. This is why from BF4 onward LMGs were mostly ARs with extra steps. MG4 and AWS send their regards.
ARs were "bad" at long range in previous games? Well, I rest my case since I think we've played different games.
- cso77773 years agoSeasoned Ace
I think the SMGs are nothing special in this game, they are often not very usable due to map-design.
ARs and LMGs are probably too strong at range, but again (as others have stated) the maps are pretty big in general.
And ARs have always been 'the best' weapons in BF (perhaps DMRs in BFV were pretty good though).
LMGs being more stationary was tried in BFV and that wasn't a success...
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,982 PostsLatest Activity: 58 minutes ago
Recent Discussions
- 58 minutes ago
- 11 hours ago
- 23 hours ago
- 2 days ago
- 2 days ago