Forum Discussion

spudbug's avatar
spudbug
Seasoned Ace
3 years ago

We don't need server browser, we need persistent matches that keep players

The server browser topic has gotten a lot of traction but I dont see it ever being a possibility for all out warfare due to how the game is built and it being a huge undertaking. What I think people...
discussion
Ironhead841's avatar
Ironhead841
Hero (Retired)
3 years ago

@AngrySquid270 

There is always pros vs * to consider as you say, but I would much rather control my own experience in regards to where and with who I want to play with. I would happily deal with the "*" you've listed for server browser and persistent servers.

Battlefield has had a server browser since its inception and it just feels like matchmaking was a solution looking for a problem.

It and the fact you can only play with a maximum of four friends is a big part (not the only reasons, I know) of the reason this game has been so negatively received.

RayD_O1's avatar
RayD_O1
Hero
3 years ago
@Ironhead841
Yeah me too, the pros definitely outweigh the * and the low player count reflects that the vast majority of players feel this way too .

Featured Places

Recent Discussions