Solved
When are we going to start petition to keep Rush?
Great mode, we need to let the developers know that it should stay.
- @solidsouthcentra You just did - yes rush please with alternating attack/defense.
Forum Discussion
7 Replies
- @solidsouthcentra You just did - yes rush please with alternating attack/defense.
Needs to stay.
We want bug and stutter free 128 player conquest and break true maps !!!
We want server browser , leaderboard , all chat , made own squad , play with more that 3 friends in one team !!!
all people who i know who plays Battlefield since year 2004 dont want micro game mode like Rush !
- @uz_bolderaju Rush does work best with 32 players. Even 64 player Rush games were pure chaos.
If those people really played BF since 2004, I guess they played BFBF2 -- what mode did they play there if they don't play Rush? 😉
So yes, Rush has to stay (I see no reason why it should not). Personally, I feel that 64 player Conquest is more important, but Rush (and TDM for leveling weapons) has to be made permanent game modes as well. true Battlefield is only Conquest large like it was in Battlefield 2
- @solidsouthcentra Needs to stay! Indeed with alternating attack/defense… its sooooo stupid that its not made like this in the first place. I can’t understand
The fact we need to let the developers know this is truly worrying, did they actually do any research in previous games. I would like to think that some of the developers played Battlefield 3 or 4 back in the day.
Keep it and and move it from Portal to the main game menu, also experiment with the map designs around it. It's a Win/Win situation for everyone.
Featured Places
