Yall really didnt like BFV?

I just didn't like the setting and barely played it.

BF1/V were just not for me. That's why 2042 is an even bigger disappointment for me... I waited so many years for a new modern BF and got nothing good...

I just hope that DICE and EA really try to rescue the BF franchise. If they succeed I will come back for sure.

But I don't think 2042 is fixable... so maybe in the next game they learned from 2042 and do it better...

---

@NiCeDiCe90 wrote:

I just didn't like the setting and barely played it.

---

Same here.  Also I purchased BFV on PS4 where the terrain pop in was so distracting that I hated playing on every map. 

---

@Flavin913 wrote:

This is the biggest surprise I have gotten comming to these forums.

Out side of crashes my only gripe with BFV at launch was the ammo/health crates not showing on the maps when they got dropped.

---

i don't know if i would have liked it or not, soderland told people "don't like it don't buy it" so i didn't. 

i didn't have an issue with women being in bf5 i just didn't like his sh*t attitude, his hubris is what p***ed me off.

---

@ElliotLH wrote:
@Flavin913Different strokes for different folks I guess. I enjoyed BFV for the most part but did have quite a few issues with it originally, such as the poor visibility and the endless animations etc. Mostly though I just enjoy BF1 and BF4 more and will play those much more frequently than BFV (I also only fly in V too).

---

I must admit I enjoyed all three, BFV / BF1 and BF4. 

Personally I loved the 4 Pacific maps in BFV they were definitely the highlight for me.

One of the negatives for me in BFV was the introduction of the elites some like Wilhelm were a bit cheesy, he looked like he had just walked off the stage in Phantom of the Opera. 🙂

The whole trench warfare setting in BF1 was really well done and they captured that era really well imho.

Really enjoyed BF4 / 3 and all the earlier ones too.

I wish I had a pound for every hour I have spent on the BF franchise, I would be a very rich man indeed.  😃

BF5 was not a very good game. Especially not a the beginning. But it had at least the essential core features (the ones they call 'legacy' now). So yes, BF5 had a rough start, but it was still Battlefield and except of the TTK debacle the core features were always where they supposed to be.

It also has some problem with map design. Just one example: Fjell 652. A very good infantry map -- completely ruined by the addition of planes. Without planes, this is really fun and I think that most players (all except of the pilots) will agree that the person that made the decision to add 5? planes PER SIDE! to this infantry map should -- if not  fired right away -- be at least NOT allowed to EVER be involved with those kind of tasks ever again.

But compared to BF2042, BF5 it is so much better that we now play BF5 again while waiting for the current installment to get the required fixes to make it enjoyable. Arras, Marita, Mercury (sometimes also ruined by planes, but not as much as Fjell), Devastation, Solomon Islands, ... ALL much more beautiful maps and all with better flow and in general better map design.

AND (for us maybe even the most important part): we can play together on the same server (takes some minutes to join, but then we can stay until the first cheater joins and ruins our fun). In BF2042 we have to split in 2 (or even 3, if we are more than 8 people) groups. This needs to be addressed with highest prio if you ask me (which you don't). But this is something for another thread.

The game was just not bad but the real lack of a proper anti cheat was very evident.

I lost track of the amount of times I spectated people who loved looking at walls for some odd reason lol.