- Yes BFV will run on an 8600K with alright performance. But why? You are literally shooting your self in the foot.
You’d benefit greatly from a 8700K. Like, not just a small boost but massive massive boost in frame rate. You’re intentionally limiting your 3060 to the ability of a much slower GPU.
And when I say 100% CPU usage. I don’t mean your CPU usage is a constant 100% 24/7 with the game
open in BFV.
I mean in a graph like MSI Afterburner monitoring all
6 of your Logical processors Will and do hit 100% all the time. Total CPU usage reports a lower number though. So you are reading your CPU usage incorrectly.
Why? Because I know this for a fact. I have graphs recorded of gameplay and my latency and 0.1% lows that show performance from my old 8086K i7 which was 12 threads. And they would often hit that 98% on all threads at once. And once that happens the GPU usage falls to the 50-80% range. And this was just with a GTX1080 at the time. Yea the game was still smooth, but your losing performance and you don’t even know it.
I mean, if you don’t want to upgrade then whatever.. Don’t upgrade. But there is a reason why I get 120-150+
fps in 2560x1440P in BF2042, and even I’m still slightly cpu limited in certain scenarios and this is at 2560x1440 on Ultra settings with DLSS off. The game is 100% butter though. Your CPU is totally overwhelmed. And it’s not the game at all.
bfv 2042 runs absolutely perfect.
EA messed up bad with the system requirements I get that. But your GPU deserves much better than a 8600K. And especially right now. Man I have a magical 10850K that runs 5.4Ghz all day long, and it’s just laying on my desk, I’d give it away just to prove my point here. That 3060 is a great card, so you are good to go there, but it’s literally golf balling through a water hose on that 8600K.