Re: Troubleshooting advice for 2042 issues

To prove the above. The same map, same atmospheric conditions (sunny).

Hi,

Another part of performance improvement tips. My CPU is i9-10900KF 10C/20T.

We all know that BF2042 is heavy CPU dependent. This may and will influence DLSS functionality - higher the upscaling is = the higher load on CPU is required, but unfortunatelly there is no space for additional workload... Therefore some of us does not see FPS improvements with DLSS enabled. I have noticed, that playing DLSS=balanced or DLSS=performance my GPU utilization is around 70-80% and CPU utilization is around 30-35%. Something is not right.

Root cause:

By default game is distributing CPU load per physical core count. So in my case I will have only 10 working threads, loaded up to 70%. The remaining 10 threads does nothing.

Fix:

Work needs to be distributed on all available threads. This cannot be achieved from the in-game's console. The only way to influence on that setting is through the User.cfg file (which does not exist by default). However settings that influence the CPU workload distribution are slightly different than it was in former Battlefields:

Create User.cfg in game's installation folder with the following content:

Thread.ProcessorCount <core count here>
Thread.MaxProcessorCount <thread count here>
Thread.MinFreeProcessorCount 0
Thread.JobThreadPriority 0

And now very important note: Thread.MaxProcessorCount cannot consume all available threads. If I set 20 game will crash on startup. Same for 19 and 18. The 17 is the max value I can use. In case of different processors you need to find the maximum possible value for your CPU.

It seems that this variable is not an exact thread count consumed by the game. For my processor, since Thread.MaxProcessorCount 14 load is distributed on ALL 20 threads. What does change from Thread.MaxProcessorCount 14-to-17 is the % of the max load possible for threads to consume.

Finally, my User.cfg looks like below:

Thread.ProcessorCount 10
Thread.MaxProcessorCount 17
Thread.MinFreeProcessorCount 0
Thread.JobThreadPriority 0

And thanks to this I increased GPU load with DLSS, which means higher FPS in the situation when GPU was not maxed out earlier.

Here are some comparison screenshots.

Default settings, DLSS=Quality@3440x1440:

User.cfg settings, DLSS=Quality@3440x1440:

Default settings, DLSS=Performance@3440x1440:

User.cfg settings, DLSS=Performance@3440x1440:

In game's console Thread.* option changes does not take effect in runtime. You need to steer the variables from the User.cfg and start the game to see the difference! And don't get confused by seeing Thread.MaxProcessorCount 8 in game's console. It's the default value, which gets internally overwritten by the core count auto-detection made by game on startup. Unfortunately this auto-detection does not take hyper-threading into account...

Cheers!

UPDATE #1 :

Game's CPU core count auto detection works fine. Use "Render.DrawScreenInfo true" in game's console to see details. Core count is a total amount of the Threads. Good! No need to use Thread.ProcessorCount.

The "Job Threads" visible on that debug screen are an exact number of threads defined by Thread.MaxProcessorCount in User.cfg. By default it is 8 threads.

Thanks @7empePL 

I have problems with my Ryzen 3800x with 8 cores and 16 threads. 

After using a user.cfg the game runs better and not only 9 cores were used now all. 
Cpu usage in avarage raised from 61% to 85% in total
Stuttering is still existing but less often.

With the 3800x i used this config file:

Thread.ProcessorCount 8
Thread.MaxProcessorCount 16
Thread.MinFreeProcessorCount 0
Thread.JobThreadPriority 0

@graulesYou're welcome. Also, you can use in-game's "Render.DrawScreenInfo true" to see the job threads being used. By default it is 8 on the CPUs with 8+ threads.

Also, what I just found is that game's auto detection of the core count works fine, so we don't have to use Thread.ProcessorCount at all.

Thread.MaxProcessorCount <value> maps to a number of the job threads.

I just tested around a bit because the game is maxing out my i7 9700k quite heavily and it tested this with the following setup: 

Thread.ProcessorCount 8
Thread.MaxProcessorCount 6
Thread.MinFreeProcessorCount 0
Thread.JobThreadPriority 0

Interesting enough that caused the FPS to be better and way more stable and the CPU wasn't maxing out either ...was around 92-96% usage which made a huge difference. But how can it be, that the game runs better on less threads :D 

Hi, i tried out your setup on my i7 9700k but it doesnt really change anything at all. All Cores are still maxed out and the game feels like glue.
With my rtx 2080 (at 25-40% max. laod) i cant achieve more than 27-40 fps with heavy drops with 1440p resolution.
No matter if on Low or Ultra settings. 

Dont know why your i7 9700k is working better with this userconfig. than mine.
Tried 5, 6  and 7 on maxprocessorcount.

(I see the changes ingame with Drawscreeninfo)

I have a i7 6700k(4 cores 8 threads) with 16GB ram and GTX1070

This fix only gives very little boost in GPU utilization but not a lot of GPU

I had tried 

Thread.ProcessorCount 4
Thread.MaxProcessorCount 6, 7, 8

In game Render.DrawScreenInfo does shows job threads properly with 6,7,8 but task manager still shows all 8 threads being nearly 100% loaded.

GPU utilization increased from 30-40% to 40-50%, but FPS still float at around ~50fps (G-Sync works in full screen only, not borderless, and this make it looks "smoother").

Maybe it only help on new CPU with more than 8 threads available

You can try use command to off count

Thread.MaxProcessorCount -1, -2