BF6 Needs More Vehicles helicopters and Jets
More Vehicles with atleast each side 2 or 3 jet and helicopters like bf4 and bf3 in Beta conquest We had to wait we only had 1 heli , 1 jet
Forum Discussion
Clearly not agree. Dont want to play war of tank. 1 heli / 1 jet / 2 tank il clearly enough. Tank/jet abuse is the best way to disgust other player on infantry. The vehicle are well balanced actually.
I'll be honest dude it's people like you who have clearly not played previous battlefields and are COD players who are going to make this become another COD. The game you are now playing is Battlefield it has always had multiple vehicles per side and a lot more than there currently is. Now I agree that these maps shouldn't have more vehicles on them if any at all as I stated previously, however the larger maps will need more vehicles and also perhaps some basic transport vehicles, not just combat based vehicles.
Classic answer "you are not battlefield player". How do you know that ? I have thousand hours of battlefield so please stfu. All the battlefield full vehicle oriented is a fail cause it s only fun for people camping in their tank and sniping the map with 5 engeener behind. The proof is simple. During battlefield 2042 (full vehicle oriented btw and the worst bf ever) the battlefield which was the most played is.... BATTLEFIELD 1 which is the LESS vehicle oriented. So before disrespect other people on the forum take 5minutes to start to think.
You lose the moral high ground within the argument when you respond with childish and vulgar remarks. If you are such a veteran of battlefield, how come you only joined the forums wihtin the last week (funnily enough when the beta launched xD). Admittedly you have some knowledge from previous titles, however the information you have wrought upon us is the most known facts in which you could have just scoured a few minutes on any website. I take it you dislike vehicles because you prefer only to be on foot and have died numerous times to vehicles? My suggestion, go back to COD dude, wait for the new title to release and be happy there, leave us BF guys to our battlefield based game with our vehicles and objectives etc. I've been playing battlefield since I played Lan party's round friends on BF 1942 or battlefield vietnam (best heli's imhho) and vehicles have always and should always be a part of a battlefield game.
I absolutly don t care about who you are. And stalk profile to decide who can or not give a feedback on forum regarding the number of post on the forum show how weird you are.
You have 0.0001% of information on people and you affirm a lot of things on them. When I read the ton of BS on your last post... Very pathetic...
Go back on battlefield 2042 with stupid invincible vehicle. The most failed AAA multiplayer game ever.
I prefer battlefield 1.
Your only argument is "if you are not agree with me go back to cod". Pointless...
I think I can have a better discussion with a dog than you.
You seems very sad. Stop stalk people on forum and post less message.
I agree with your point. Finally some common sense. Vehicles are a core component of Battlefield, and the game offers means of dealing with them as infantry. 🙂
not true battlefield 1 was very vehicle oriented what do you mean you had horses, cars, armored trucks, tanks and fianlly planes, dont get me started with the behemoths like the train and blimp, battlefield 6 isnt battlefield
Tank in battlefield 1 was :
slow, difficult to move, easy to kill (2 artillery shot), need a lot of people inside, vision was low.
No heli, horse was so easy to kill ... Plane was very limited in term of impact comparing to all other BF and was destroyed on 5 second by DCA.
Behemot is another topics which was used to balance game with a stomp and not so hard to destroy. When I say not vehicle oriented it means that they are not broken.
BF4 / 2042 are vehicle oriented. And player playing vehicles where near to impossible to counter. They have Mobility, repairing tool, anti missile system a lot of weapon, distance. Etc.
