The vehicles in Battlefield 6 are too weak.
I am extremely disappointed with this beta test. The Battlefield franchise now feels like it has completely abandoned its roots. This test did not give me the feeling of a return to Battlefield 1 or ...
Forum Discussion
From what i have saw , all combat vehicles endurance is perfect ... i realy do like it . why are you asking for a super tank or helicopter when in reality a simple 400 $ drone can take down a Abrams or a helicopter, or at list, it can incapacitate the vehicles. So , combat vehicles are ok and are much more things to do,like optimise the game. That's what i had to say ,see you in BattleField !
I'm not asking for overpowered super-tanks or super-helicopters. But you absolutely must achieve a better balance between infantry and vehicles.
During my gameplay yesterday, I witnessed single infantry players destroying enemy tanks multiple. times For a modern warfare tank, the absence of reactive armor and APS is fundamentally illogical.
The respawn timer for infantry is a mere 8 seconds, yet a destroyed vehicle takes two and a half minutesto respawn. The fact that infantry can eliminate a tank at such a disproportionately low cost is blatantly unbalanced.
Compounding this is the extremely low splash damage of the tank's main cannon. Shells practically need a direct hit on an infantry soldier's body to secure a kill – this is utterly unreasonable for a tank and makes supporting teammates and breaking through enemy lines nearly impossible.
Regarding air vehicles, I wander know that if you have spent time piloting helicopters or jets in-game. The excessive inertia makes helicopters incredibly difficult to turn and incapable of performing basic maneuvers. Helicopters in this state are little more than decorative props, let alone effective tools for engaging enemy assets.
I am not demanding super-powered vehicles.All I want is a fair, balanced combat experience where every element has its viable role.
A tanks main gun isn't for shooting infantry it's for shooting other armored vehicles. They're high penetration rounds they don't splash they "dig" through armor. Again, gunners are for keeping infantry at bay while the main gun is for targeting other tanks. Why do vehicle mains hate the idea of actually fighting other vehicles so much? As for maneuvering helis the best advice I can give is to remember the chopper follows the prop, you don't lead with your "nose".
If you have tried the helicopter of battlefield4 or battlefield2042, you will know that the helicopter operation in this test is a disaster.
Have you considered... That Vehicles without infantry support are doomed? The tank is there to support the infantry by destroying lines and other vehicles. If You cannot support your tank supporting you you don't deserve to have armor support.
I agree with the concept of "vehicle-carrier synergy", but if tanks are too weak, they will be destroyed by RPGs from all directions once they launch an attack. In that case, vehicles can only become camper vehicles. In Battlefield 6, tanks are not even equipped with reactive armor or APS.
It's battlefield, not real life. If they added drones which could take out tanks then no one would be playing the game.
规划师不懂车辆。为了平衡，他们降低了战车的火力和机动性，这是不合理的。如今的坦克很脆弱，但这并不意味着它们的火力较弱或机动性较差。车辆可以像玻璃一样脆弱，但其火力和机动性绝不能被削弱。
i hear that planner comes from the grop of COD lol
I do actually agree 100% with this. Splash/Frag/Over-pressure damage does need increased for the Tanks vs. Infantry with APHE/HE. Maybe not so much with HEAT or APFSDS unless it's like a hardened structure and the EFP jet from the HEAT catches you, or you get direct hit with the dart from the APFSDS.
