I believe it would be very difficult to balance. Imagine a premade team of eight players joining a 64 player server. I think they should keep the limit at four, as it seems to be the current plan.
This is a terrible suggestion. We never had issues with this during BF4 days. I can have up to 8 people In our ps chat and we want to play the same game
We did have issues during the BF4 days. It's just that you don't see 8 member parties all that often. But when it happens the balance goes to crap.
What balance? I have yet to play a balanced game in bf6. I cant remember playing a balanced game in 2042 either. Its not like there will be only 1 premade in games either. You place premades on each team and fill the gaps with solo players. In the end its not about party size but about people playing objectives instead of tdm.
Dice is forcing people to exclude people out of a group of friends. This is literally a company encouraging ostracism.
100% correct.
It feels like The people promoting the revisionist history that it was this big issue are either too young to have played battlefield before 2042 where switching teams was removed or bots/on the ea payroll.
What balance indeed, The amount of times I got into an escalation game and we got absolutely boat raced because no one played the objective was alarming.
From what I've seen the game could use more pre mades.
It's every man for himself chaos in 70% of matches.
Little teamwork, few revives, even fewer resupplies.
There were no issues during BF4 when you had good server browser and you were able to change teams during match.
