BRING BACK 64 PLAYER BREAKTHROUGH
With the latest update for whatever reason DICE has completely dropped the ball. Why do you make normal Breakthrough mode into 48 players maximum? I thought we have casual Breakthrough for these ki...
Forum Discussion
I personally don't like Breakthrough in Battlefield 6. I liked it much better in Battlefield 2042 and that's saying something. In my opinion the maps are too narrow to properly facilitate 64 players. It's too heavy on passive positional play and tanks and not enough on flanking and repositioning. So it makes some sense to me that you either increase the map size, or reduce the player count to match the size of the map.
This whole idea that we need to make Casual game modes because the regular game modes are too hectic and unpredictable seems like a waste of time to me.
sure, I also understand your point of view. I usually dont care about what the player count is as long as it's fun. But on Mirak Valley for example it just feels empty and all that people do is snipe you from miles away. Before the player count change it was an absolute all out chaos blast.
I think the real solution here would be, as it has been stated many times, an actual server browser!
Then we can have 48 & 64 player count servers at the same time and people can pick and choose what kind of match they want to experience at any given time.Why are you lying? Mirak Valley is still 64 players, 32 vs 32, and firestorm too, LMAO.
these kind of people making posts straight up lying is insane, you didn't even play, saw people talking about being 48 and decided to jump on the hate too?
