Can the dev team start to acknowledge how utterly garbage the maps are

I like most of the maps. The small infantry only ones are ok if you are into team DM or whatever. Guessing there will be no lack of maps in a few months. 

The devs don't have a clue what they are doing.

We've been shouting from the rooftops for months to bring proper BF maps with more emphasis on vehicle play.  But they keep tripling down and cranking out this map gimmick slop.  Where are the f**** boat maps? Where's the rain and adverse dynamic weather?

E_Haggis​ Yes, agree with everything you said, but, regarding the "rain and adverse dynamic weather" you want. Be careful they don't start adding those ret"%$£d bloody tornado's we had to suffer in 2042.

The only thing I find really bad in BF6, apart from sound issues, TTK/TTD, **bleep** 30Hz servers, bizarre spawn problems etc etc ( I could go on. ), is the complete lack of maps.

When you go multiplayer on say casual conquest, it's the same few maps over and over and over and over and again.

They should rename it "Boringfield 6"

They know exactly what they are doing. The whole map design is based around their decisions for short range gameplay and short engagement times. 

There's not enough cover in most maps, choke points don't seem to well thought out and I feel game play in general on most maps is a cluster***, meat grind, respawn fest. Perhaps I need a few more hours to get to know the maps better, but at presnet I am not particuarly enjoying this.