Forum Discussion
players that take massive damage and insta kill you are cheating. Has nothing to do with lag, players can even lag themselves on purpose and manipulate the netcode. This game feels like the same engine and no different then past bf games. We shouldn't blame EA for that like they want us to though. Even when it is ea employees themselves, inside the company itself, who want us to. Its out of their control and its up to the gov't to take action. It might sound fascist to a very sensitive person, but we have laws in civilized society for a reason. The problem is we have yet to evolve and consider the digital realm just an extension of the physical. instead we treat it as some alternate universe and acting like its a different reality without the same principles laws, is what is leading us to our self destruction. And I can't believe nothing has changed in 20 years.
So, when a lobby full of bots behaves this way, I should blame the bots for cheating and have the government arrest EA's server?
That is a silly and hype take.
- CoolitRich25 days agoRising Traveler
I'm not understanding your english. When a lobby full of bots acts what way? why would you ban a bot? Are you talking about actual game bots? Cheat engine bots? Or are we talking what the cheaters have programmed you to call noob players? to instill a taint on your soul and to distract and make it more acceptable to use cheat bots.... To change the term from being derogatory against them, to now in modern times a tool to demonize honest players with the term instead of themselves. Which one is it? I'm old school so to me the word bot means cheat. I shattered your world. i get it, you will cope eventually. its a take from someone who is obviously not new to bf. Because i've heard all this about bc2, bf3, bf1, bfv, and now bf6. Observed the behavior of players and servers throughout the years. I guess ever since frostbite engine was released people complain about the netcode, to players who take extra dmg and insta kill them. But the fact you are acting like this is some new phenomena to bf6, means you have no credibility with me. You are the silly and hype take in my eyes, and are simply projecting. Whats hilarious to me, is it not even a phenomena just to this franchise. smh.....
And if you are complaining about your hit reg against actual game bots...lmao, well to me that is what is really silly.... I would care less about that then I would care about people playing against bots for xp. who cares? EA always keeps their games play to win. not pay or grind to win. I just use the base guns. stop the nonsense. Let people who don't like getting pwned by unsportlike players on stacked teams play with bots.- Ty_Ger0725 days agoSeasoned Ace
AI. Bots. A lobby that only has bots in it. A lobby against no humans. You know that is an option in this game, right? Is it hard to understand the language of the game you play?
Bot lobbies do the same thing. You load up a bad lobby where 50% to 66% of your bullets vanish and do no damage. It's a thing. It's not cross-play's problem. It's not bots cheating. It's the game either on the client side or the server side. Something is wrong with the game. It's bad. It's worse than before.
You claimed the problem was caused by cheaters, but I provided an example where it is not possible for cheaters to be the cause.
Bots "doing it" (happening against bots):
It's lame to give EA/DICE the pass and scapegoat it. I'm sure some people are cheating, but that's not what we are all dealing with.
Going down the conspiracy rabbit hole, there is a belief that COD alters game balance to make someone with a better skin or more money invested play better. So, when the timing of an interraction was close, the win is given to that player who spent more money in order to psychologically trick them into thinking their purchase was worth it, or to make the losing player feel like something about that player's approach and purchase choices makes them a better player to strive for. It is a conspiracy and unproven, but is backed by patents and statements which could be construed to be confirmation.
Likewise, we could assume that BF6 is doing similar psychological tweaks to make one match feel unlosable and another match unwinnable, but again I don't know why it would also happen against bots.
I think the game is just messed up.
- CoolitRich25 days agoRising Traveler
I'll have to take your word for it even though I find it hard to believe. I think they should let people run and manage their own servers, imho, and then we just need the gov't to help with the ddos attacks. its that simple really. I still go back to the same thing brother in the end. It sounds like you just rolling the "dice" at if you get a good server or a pwned one at this point. I don't notice anything, but a little lag doesn't bother me I come from quake. I told you my opinion on guys who take dmg and insta kill. Their score also tells the tale.
At the end of BF3 for example, the only servers that were left being hosted, were full of cheats and would lag out. I mean like I would hitch in certain servers I knew to avoid, because they were clan names and servers I would just get destroyed in, while my game would be stuttering on their servers on top of it. While the matches would be completely stacked out lmao. I kid you not. And eventually those were the only servers left. So I understand EA's unwillingness to let people host their own servers again. Because its literally just rewarding hackers. I mean we keep ignoring the elephant in the room brother, but its always going to be there. These types of people pwn players by cheating in the game, with either bot engines or stacking teams, the pwn EA and the servers by literally taking control of them and who knows what they do to them, and they will even pwn people outside of ea's servers. And they face no repercussions, these are the times we are living in and i'm not sure when society is going to wake up because it literally has been going on for over 20 years lol.
And these same people, have you blaming EA for it.