LMG - Extended Mags Cost Too Much

Question

40 points for an extended magazine just isn't worth it and a complete waste of points. You littersly can't set your gun up nicely because of it.

The fact that proper suppression isnt in the game (like BF1) makes it less attractive as well. It doesn't make it worth it because camping and suppressing is hard to survive since you get easily taken out despite being a "heavy hitter."

So as a consequence, you have to keep moving. Adding an extended magazine that most likely affects maneuverability and removes loads of attatchments, as well as no suppression effects, isnt worth it at all.

Fix:

Make it 30 points (- 10) &,
Implement BF1 suppression.

Cheers.

skeetermh · Answer

The point cost for certain guns and their mags (and some other attachments) definitely need to be reviewed. some guns have their fast and +10 cost 5 to 10 points more than regular while some guns like the m250 with a default 50 cost 5 but a 100 round mag costs 45 points (HALF THE POINT BUDGET).

Agreed, suppression NEEDS to greatly affect accuracy (especially for snipers) and increase your aim sway (increasing with higher magnification). Dumping a whole mag at a sniper and it does nothing to his aim so he will still headshot you with 1 bullet from 300+ meters is unfair.

Forum Discussion

LMG - Extended Mags Cost Too Much

1 Reply

Featured Places

Battlefield 6 General Discussion

Community Highlights

[GUIDE] EA Account Help: No Access, Disabled Accounts, Hacks, Bans, and More

Recent Discussions

Seasonal reminder: Unbalanced matchmaking needs fixing.

Thank you for not listening to streamers anymore.

Boats!

Will dynamic weather return in the future?

VSSM Is a Joke: Drop Forced Subsonic, Boost Velocity, Add Extended Suppressor