This is not a solution or an informed response to my concerns. Passively linking to a page isn't helpful in any capacity when it doesn't resolve the issues I have with stutters and performance.
That aside, do you genuinely believe it's acceptable for a standard end-user PC gamer to have to update and modify BIOS, convert boot partitions, all to potentially get their PC stuck in a boot loop in the hopes of paying you to play your game? Who on earth would look at this as a sound business decision when trying to appeal to the same demographic you've let down in the past? When there are so many games with kernel-level anti-cheat that don't require fiddling needlessly with BIOS and risking a bricked computer, how is this acceptable or user-friendly?
Did you guys have SecureBoot enabled in 2021 when people stole the source code to one of the FIFA games? Did it stop THOSE hackers? Is this just an attempt to look more proactive about hackers? I'm genuinely incredibly interested in the thought process behind the decision from a business perspective as opposed to what's written on that page for the public that you linked. Kernel level anti-cheats are just as subject to being circumvented as userspace anti-cheats, and this forced SecureBoot thing was seemingly implemented in FIFA so that users couldn't exploit purchases from the market, NOT to improve the gameplay experience for the players. I say this because up until now I haven't seen it in other EA titles (That didn't have big stores in the first place).
Why does this game require SecureBoot when so many other games with Kernel-level Anti-cheat do not?
