I feel that multiplayer games such as Battlefield should be server-based, with players all client-side, like War Thunder. Hacking is much easier to find and block, and syncing is now based on ping, not processor.
If you can afford a PC then you can afford a PlayStation or an Xbox. That way you can have all of those fantastic, unbelievable aim assist advantages AND can even turn Crossplay OFF! (As I have. ;-D)
Haven't you realized by now that the future of multiplayer online gaming is all about consoles which are getting better and better all the time!
Put your Playstation or Xbox near the TV, drag your comfy chair up to the widescreen ultra high def television with a nice Soundbar, get your beverage of choice and... ENJOY! :-D
Or are you going to wait until there's some mystical, magical desync "fix" fof PC which will never come...?
Actually, you're incorrect. The companies are aiming for Cloud Gaming and AI generative gaming. They want to eliminate the need for dedicated hardware and studio development. It's been said they want to have AI tailor an individual gaming experience to that person. You forget, consoles run off the same Hardware as PCs. Just PCs have a muti-use operating systems.
Before AI development Microsoft was experimenting hard with having Xbox integrate into phone, PC, and home devices. They wanted a complete smart home system and at first they were aiming it to being powered by the cloud. Especially when they were seeing giant profits from Cell phone games. For some time, our style gamer market was dying, and team based gaming was being pushed out for Battle Royale Loot Box games and pretty much anything that has a micro-transaction.
Battlefield never had a real focus on skins or heroes, it was balls to the wall action, explosive and huge team play. It didn't matter if it was on console or PC, now it's being squished into small maps without the ability to have your own server. The community aspect is dead, they want people addicted to mediocrity and microtransactions.
