Well now I know!

Same thing happens to me on xbox with cross play off.

Plug a controller into a PC and it has the same aim assist. What you describe is something other than aim assist.

I am referring to aim assist.  I do have an Xbox controller paired with my pc.

They have the same aim assist. Same aim assist. Same recoil reduction.

What is the point you are trying to make? You claimed that consoles gave quick kills. That is net code, not aim assist.

As a keyboard and mouse xbox player, I disagree that the TTK is better. Are you implying that the netcode has some hidden function that if it is a console and is using a controller, the damage is increased or netcode favors the controller-using console player instead of the controller-using PC player or keyboard-and-mouse-using console player?

I am having a hard time userstanding what the claim is. Your claim seems obviously to be a claim about netcode or a damage boost favoring console. But you keep saying aim assist. I'm baffled.

Mouse+keyboard and controller each have their advantages in just about every game ever made.  Controller has objecively better movement capeabilties and convientient button mapping, whereas M+K has more precise aiming and more assignable keys.   Aim assist on controller is designed to mitigate the advantage of m+k aiming but is rarely perfect depending on the game.

In BF6, I have found that controller has a significant advantage in close quarters engagments because of what I mentioned above, while m+k has an advantage a longer ranges.  I play on PC and use m+k for any gamemode where most of my engangments will be at 40+yds.  I switch to controller for anything cqb.  M+k has an enormous advantage when sniping though, to the point where they are barely even comparable.

Ok…I am saying it seems as though the aim assist is not there on pc. . Two things I did just start with a new controller that hasn’t been used before. And it seems as though recoil is way more noticeable. It may just be me…I know nothing about net code. I’m sure that is still clear as mud. I will still mess around with the settings to see it that helps. 
I do have the aim assist turned on. It doesn’t seem to help at all. I used to be a keyboard mouse player too but muscular dystrophy has my hands messed up. Plus I’m 52, old as dirt and it’s not that big of a deal.

There's a lot of us who hate seeing Battlefield being ruined with this LAME controller nonsense. I don't see how anyone can think that allowing that junk in FPS games is okay.

This is not the Battlefield I fell in love with over 20 years ago. Far from it, and that's truly a shame. 🙁

There’s definitely something else going on alongside Aim Assist. I borrowed a controller from a friend yesterday, I’d had it with these aim assist players and wanted to see if I could match their “skill”.  First off, on PC, using a controller is difficult if you’re not used to it. Lots of trying to figure out keyboard controls and what goes on limited buttons on the controller.

I tried it out on casual breakthrough. 

It absolutely helps aim. It absolutely reduces recoil/bloom. It’s deadly up close, and hipfire is crazy accurate. It takes almost no effort to maintain aim. That said - you cannot maintain full auto fire without bloom becoming a factor except for some SMG or other “meta” zero recoil setups.  You cannot consistently make headshots with sniper rifles or any other weapon… Assist doesn’t work like that, especially at increased distances. I used all the weapon classes and the meta setups made many of guns laser beams. So if someone’s constantly headshotting, that’s big sus, and highly likely a cheat.  Getting 60 meter no miss kills with SMGs is something I couldn’t really do, so either players doing this are outright cheating or there’s further setup I needed to do. 

I dislike controllers and will not be using it further, I’ve never owned a console, I do just as well with MnK, but the advantage is crystal clear. You can get at or near zero bloom for many kits, it provides a clear advantage, zero-bloom kills at greater distances possibly indicate cheats or other assists like scripts or Cronus devices. 

I used to be keyboard and mouse exclusive back when counterstrike was huge. I was beast at it and could not for the life of me understand the appeal of console controllers. Over time I became use to controllers, but never have, ever became as good with any controller…and at my age I just don’t really care. 

"As a keyboard and mouse xbox player, I disagree that the TTK is better. Are you implying that the netcode has some hidden function that if it is a console and is using a controller, the damage is increased or netcode favors the controller-using console player instead of the controller-using PC player or keyboard-and-mouse-using console player?"

YES, exactly this. A console does not have the network overhead that a PC does. Think about what is running on a PC, all the services, the other background processes, drivers, discord, YT or at least a browser opened. It adds to the networking stack. Console is streamlined to do just the game. Therefore, consoles get to the server first. Even if a PC has a faster internet connection (a 5 ping) it does not mean their packets are accepted by the server first. I cannot prove it but I am of the opinion that ALL crossplay games, console gets a networking advantage over PC. I saw this in COD too but no company will admit to it and no developer has talked about it ever!

I will say though, a KB&M using console should have the same network response as a controller using console. That won't matter, but VS a PC, the lower network overhead and faster acceptance/response from the server is noticeable.