Forum Discussion

vx_firedragon_xv's avatar
vx_firedragon_xv
New Traveler
21 hours ago

High explosive should kill infantry in one hit

how do you justify ANYTHING high explosive not killing infantry in one hit. I dont care if its a Claymore, and RPG and laser guided rocket. if any of those things explode within a handful of feet of a person that person should be dead. IM SOOOOO sick and tired of hitting people with claymores and not killing them, im sick and tired of hitting people in the face with an RPG and not killing them. 

BF's bread and butter was always make the most encompassing and realistic shooter possible. MAKE THIS TRASH REALISTIC!

[CM edit - formatting and descriptive title]

4 Replies

  • +1 to this, we need more splash damage & making claymores not a 1 hit kill feels absurd.

    You should communicate these things without being so aggressive about it, it detracts from your actual points and is really unnecessary.

  • because than tanks would have to be one or two hit to the rear and let me guess, you would complain about that?

     

  • Ruxem's avatar
    Ruxem
    Rising Scout
    8 hours ago

    BF has never been realistic, you just obviously haven't been to war and your only experience is being an armchair soldier in video games.

  • UP_Hawxxeye's avatar
    UP_Hawxxeye
    Legend
    8 hours ago
    d69fd7d9150d78c9 wrote:

    because than tanks would have to be one or two hit to the rear and let me guess, you would complain about that?

    they used to be until recently, meanwhile the HE shells were even worse than now.

    the fact is that there is no tangible benefit of using the HE shells over the starting middle ground shells. They might as well delete them if they do not want them to do their job

Featured Places

Node avatar for Battlefield 6 General Discussion

Battlefield 6 General Discussion

Join the Battlefield 6 community to get game information and updates, talk tactics and share Battlefield moments.Latest Activity: 4 minutes ago
11,129 Posts