Forum Discussion
The gaming landscape has changed drastically since BF2 days, and that means a little more flash and Hollywood is needed.
BF1 was well received by the community and for me, it's their best title since BF3. I understand thr frustrations with BFV - a lot ofnplayers are having thrm, especially when it comes to visibility. I believe starting fresh with a live service is ultimately what did them in but at the end of thr day, the player base wasn't split because of premium and a bunch of players spent lots on mtx like EA wanted.
BFV isn't a typical WWII game - DICE said right off thr bat not to expect the same old battles again. I've always found the WWII crowd to be worse than thr PC elitists - nothing good can ever come from tweaking a tried and true bread and butter battles of the second world war and it really bugs me.
My hopes are high with BF6 - I have no secret knowledge about anything BF6 related but can only assume a lot of care will be put into it with so many studios and people working on it
gaming hasnt changed. you kids just expect folks to cater to your nonsense
these devs dont need to do that to be successful
they just need to go back to bf2 and bring back the elements that made that game great: V2K, competitive maps, no out of bounds
get rid of all this hand holding nonsense that deludes players into thinking they are better then they are. focus on teams and clans and dedicated groups over solo players.
solo players or less capable players can either htfu or play something else.
About Battlefield Franchise Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 2 hours ago
- 6 hours ago