Forum Discussion
353 Replies
- blackhero211 year agoRising Adventurer
It's very frustrating, and I keep seeing content creators who had early access to the game like Bordeaux keep saying it's NIL related, but we don't care for changing the names of generated players, we don't care for necessarily changing their skin tones (CFB Revamped figured out how to create recruits for the game that match their positions, EA can too), we just don't want our 5 star QB coming in and being #21 or #19 for his whole career. We aren't asking for too much, I'm bigger on # changes for generated recruits than player ratings and for the love of everything holy bring back the old training results screen so we know how much a player improved. Again, CFB revamped even had it so if your team had a bad year some of your players ratings went down.
- brad92111 year agoNew Veteran
Trying to stay consistent here on my daily bump until an actual answer is given.
I get what everyone is saying about real player NIL and the legalities of that but I can literally go and edit the fake WR named "Darnell Lee" for FSU and change it to one of the real players who didn't opt in. Now of course I can't edit the jersey number or face but I can match his measurements and equipment. To me that shouldn't be allowed if they are worried about NIL implications. Who cares if I change Major Smoker, Jose Burrow, or Legend Chocolatey's number or anything else for that matter. Just dumb. @EA_Kent
- brad92111 year agoNew Veteran
Legend chocolatey got me man LOL… sad that it’s true though….
Not stopping til we get an answer. We demand change.
- LCPLOC521 year agoSeasoned Scout@bjhill21 I really don't believe it has anything to do with NIL. I think it's just EA being lazy and releasing a half done product. I haven't touched this game in about two weeks. I can't even run an I-Formation option based offense because I-Form Pro is the only I-Form set that has any option plays in it. Hopefully they're paying attention to this thread and make the changes we've been asking for because this game is a major letdown for me.
- xPats4Lifex1 year agoSeasoned Ace@LCPLOC52 its sad that they had 10 years to perfect the game and people still think its an unfinished product... i had so much hope for this game and have been nothing but disappointed
- xPats4Lifex1 year agoSeasoned Ace
the fact that all madden players complain about franchise and now us CFB players complain about dynasty kind of just shows to me where EA stands on these game modes. these should be pivotal modes like it is in 2k... these game modes should by far have the most depth, customization, immersion etc. I would of rather just played NCAA14 another year to have dynasty be a functional game mode.
- brad92111 year agoNew Veteran
@xPats4Lifex Atleast 2k gave us my league before going after all the microtransaction cash grabs… I can at least respect that. Take care of your core offline customer first and everything else comes with out people constantly bad mouthing your company. Can you imagine this game with my league level of customization?!?! I would never put it down and be happy to pay the full price of 70 dollars each year for simply the roster update. Because they would have earned my business by putting in the effort. Instead I find myself so frustrated from past with madden and now this I may never buy any EA game again.
- trengel1 year agoRising Hotshot
@brad9211 wrote:@xPats4Lifex Atleast 2k gave us my league before going after all the microtransaction cash grabs… I can at least respect that. Take care of your core offline customer first and everything else comes with out people constantly bad mouthing your company. Can you imagine this game with my league level of customization?!?! I would never put it down and be happy to pay the full price of 70 dollars each year for simply the roster update. Because they would have earned my business by putting in the effort. Instead I find myself so frustrated from past with madden and now this I may never buy any EA game again.
Completely agree - 100%