Here’s the reality at the FBS level there are no female head coaches or coordinators. NCAA 26 is marketed as a simulation of real college football, and reflecting that reality isn’t exclusion — it’s authenticity.
Yes, women are starting to break barriers from Ivy League position coaches to analysts at Dartmouth and UConn, and even trailblazers in the NFL. Those are good things, absolutely worth acknowledging. But in the context of this game, they’re moot at best. NCAA 26 isn’t simulating interns, analysts, or the NFL. It’s simulating FBS football and in that world, those roles don’t exist yet.
That’s why this whole argument collapses. You’re trying to frame reality as ‘exclusion’ to push a fantasy option, while the overwhelming majority of players are begging for stability, smarter AI, dynasty recruiting that matters, real physics, and core football mechanics that actually work. That’s the real conversation, not a niche checkbox feature.
That logic doesn’t hold up. The coach creator exists to let you step into a role within the framework of real college football By that argument, you could say “remove custom uniforms, custom names, or custom playbooks because they aren’t real either.” But those tools are about adding variety while still respecting the structure of the game as it actually exists. Adding female head coaches to FBS football doesn’t add variety — it rewrites reality.
It’s the same logic as men competing in women’s sports — bending reality for optics instead of authenticity. NCAA 26 is supposed to simulate college football as it exists today. At the FBS level, there are no female head coaches or coordinators. That isn’t exclusion, it’s accuracy.
At this point, the back-and-forth is redundant and honestly ridiculous. If having a woman avatar makes the game better for you, I’m not going to argue that — I’ll bow out here, because it’s clear this thread is more about ideology than football.”**