Forum Discussion

LaCraig45's avatar
LaCraig45
Rising Rookie
2 days ago

Texas Longhorns Player Ratings - Feedback and Request for Clarification

Hello EA Sports Team,

First, I want to express my appreciation for the continued effort your team puts into updating College Football 27 throughout the season. I understand that evaluating thousands of players across numerous programs is a significant undertaking.

With approximately three-quarters of the season completed, I’ve noticed that several Texas Longhorns starters and key contributors have received minimal ratings adjustments, with some retaining their launch ratings despite consistent playing time and strong performances.

As a passionate Texas fan, I watch these players perform at a high level week after week. I’ll admit it’s a little disappointing when Friday’s ratings updates arrive and certain players receive little to no recognition, especially when game film and statistical data appear to support improvements.

I’ve also noticed what seems to be more ratings decreases than increases for Texas, while other programs appear to receive more frequent upgrades. I recognize that my observations may not reflect the full picture, which is why I’d genuinely appreciate some clarification.

Specifically, I’d like to better understand:

  1. What performance metrics and evaluation criteria determine ratings increases or decreases?
  2. How are consistent starters and emerging contributors evaluated when their ratings remain unchanged for several weeks?
  3. How does EA ensure ratings adjustments are applied fairly and consistently across all programs?

For example, Texas starting MLB #28 Justin Cryer has started since Week 1 but remains rated 79 overall. I’m not suggesting that starting automatically warrants an increase, but I believe his performance deserves a thorough evaluation based on available film, statistics, and positional responsibilities.

My intention isn’t to request inflated ratings or preferential treatment for Texas. I simply want to see players across college football recognized fairly for their actual performance, whether that means increasing, decreasing, or maintaining their ratings.

I appreciate the work EA continues to do and hope this feedback is helpful. Greater transparency regarding the evaluation process would go a long way toward helping fans understand and appreciate the weekly updates.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Respectfully,

A College Football 27 Player and Texas Longhorns Fan

No RepliesBe the first to reply