Can we get more variety in the maps?
Currently, the maps in this game are by far not as varied as they could be: There is always the same amount of Tiberium, there is always a missile silo, there are always two or three missile pads, th...
Forum Discussion
@AcidSnowScArab wrote:I've played maybe 300 games, and I've only bought 2 harvesters ~five times in my career. ...With that said I too would like to see more map variety, but as iLikeToSnipe21 mentions, some decks would get wrecked by unpredictable maps (like if someone always builds expensive units and relies on 2 harvesters, but loads a map with no Tiberium).
Nevertheless, I think it would add some very interesting gameplay variety to load into a map that is something atypical of what we have now.
Oh well... learn to play more versatile! Lol
Why? I just got off of a 21 win streak. Getting 2 harvesters is overrated, I stomp ~80% of players that I go up against that use the strat.
no, I’m alking about the part where you said if a player that relies on high level tech units comes into a match with no tiberium. I’m not speaking about YOU specifically, I’m saying if anyone can only win with high level tech stuff that they need to learn to be more versatile.
@AcidSnowScArab wrote:Why? I just got off of a 21 win streak. Getting 2 harvesters is overrated, I stomp ~80% of players that I go up against that use the strat.
Well, how do you overcome their units which protect their harvesters? Oftentimes, you need something that is strong vs. infantry (Missile/Laser Troops), something that is strong vs. vehicles (Harvester), and their harvester is far away from you, and you need to charge the missile pads, and you need to build your own harvester. And pretty much all of that at the same time. Easier said than done, isn't it? 🤔
