Re: Ignoring your player base

We are all submitting valuable information which required a fair amount of game play to ascertain. Itd be fantastic if EA would work with us, the customers, who are testing this game for them. 

Ive got a $100 in and Ive never spent that on a game before. I am sure there are people with much heavier investments. 

We don't want to see the game fail. It has serious potential to generate revenue for many years. If it is fine tuned.

the problem is the pay to win concept for this game thats why people are not liking it i may have put $5 into it but now i wont put anything else into it but like i said before they are banking on it to be a pay to win game 

Yea ... This game has potential ... only its timing was bad.

Release it while we are enraged for the lack of a proper C&C game since 2007 (because really ... that C&C 4 never happened and noone is allowed to talk about that abomination) was a bad call.

If i were EA, i would announce the remakes that we are aware now thx to reddit, show some footage to make everyone happy again, and then i would announce the mobile game so people can have fun while waiting for the real experience.

Man ... that EA guy from the E3 saying "Command & Conquer for a new generation" with a straight face ... man ... i wanteded to ... AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

NO NO NO. The new generation want * games and easy things. 90% of C&C player base are made by old school gamers playing the stuff since C&C 95 (my self included)

Like you, i dont want to see it fail. Make C&C Great Again !

I hope things change, but unfortunately, its been a long time since EA heard its costumers before its investors. And really ... guys in suits dont know how great games are made.

ya this game is totally * GDI has a slower build time and slower troops but OP on damage and health as far as i can tell