Thank you for recognizing Geraldine Blecker’s contribution to Dragon Age: Origins. Her portrayal of Shale was a testament to how skill and dedication can create characters that leave a lasting impact, elevating the game as a whole. However, there is a broader issue that must be addressed. When we talk about a franchise like Dragon Age, we’re discussing a legacy built by extraordinary professionals. These individuals, who earned their positions through merit and skill, established Dragon Age as a cornerstone in RPG history. Games like Dragon Age: Origins and Inquisition didn’t achieve success by accident. These titles were celebrated because talented teams poured their effort and expertise into crafting complex stories, unforgettable characters, and immersive worlds. Their goal wasn’t to cater to fleeting ideological trends; it was singular and clear: excellence; and that effort was rewarded. Dragon Age: Inquisition earned the title of Game of the Year, not because it followed fads, but because it represented the pinnacle of what an RPG could be. It honored the fundamental principles of the genre and the intelligence of its audience; players who recognize and value quality.
On the other hand, problems arise when the focus shifts from creating works rooted in merit to chasing external agendas, like those associated with "woke" trends. The issue isn’t inclusion or diversity itself, but the superficial way these ideas are often implemented. When such priorities begin to overshadow narrative quality, character depth, and gameplay innovation, the results are devastating. The outcome? A final product devoid of soul, one that fails to honor the legacy of its predecessors and, worse, alienates the loyal fanbase that has sustained the franchise for years. (...) This approach undermines everything Dragon Age stands for. It risks erasing the hard work of those who built the series not because those professionals failed, but because their contributions are being overshadowed by decisions that prioritize trends over substance. The most concerning part is that this could lead to the loss of everything that made the franchise great, jeopardizing a legacy that took years to establish. Including Geraldine Blecker in the memorial credits isn’t just a deserved tribute; it’s a symbol of what Dragon Age once was and what it still can be. It serves as a reminder that success isn’t built by chasing trends but by respecting the hard work and excellence of those who contributed to creating something timeless. By honoring talents like Blecker’s, we reaffirm that true greatness stems not from external agendas but from the relentless efforts of those who dare to create something extraordinary.
The central question here is simple: Dragon Age doesn’t need fleeting validation; it needs a return to what made it exceptional. The loyal fanbase that has supported the series for more than a decade doesn’t need to be replaced by an audience that often consumes media only superficially. That fanbase is still here, waiting for the franchise to honor its roots and deliver the epic, memorable experiences that defined its name.
So yes, it is crucial that Geraldine Blecker be remembered. But it is equally crucial that the hard work, talent, and dedication of those who made Dragon Age great be preserved and celebrated. What’s at stake isn’t just a name in the credits, but the very future of the franchise. Dragon Age must honor its past so that it can return to being what it has always been: a symbol of excellence in the RPG genre. 🎲🎮
