I feel you misunderstood, he answered. By not answering, he told you that EA does not care about you using something you purchased under an agreement that you have have access to the material once it was in your possession. They told you that you are not worth their time to actually look into the issue. They told you that you have no choice but to use them for these products so you can go f* yourself with a dried out cactus. They do not care, because they have a monopoly on their products. They know that if they told you that you would have to murder family to use their products, enough people would, to pay their bills. They have zero morals and zero ethics. You assumed when you asked the question they gave a damn about you or the rest of us. They don't. He answered you, EXACTLY how EA wanted him to answer, by spitting in your face and attempting to speak down to you, as if you hadn't actually tried the basics. They hate their customers, and show their disdain for us at every opportunity. Be it this horrendously designed launcher system, destroying decades of game canon just to con fans of a game franchise that they purchased, because they saw a cash grab, not a successful franchise. If I were going to use metaphors I would say the game industry has been taken over by the minions of Hell, and EA is lucifer himself, while the rest of the developers are all on there knees waiting for them to give it to them the way they like, before finding as many customers to return that favor to as possible. To answer your initial question, have you attempted to use any "independently developed" patches that allow games to run without calling home? I have found some of those for some of the more annoying games, especially the ones I like to play if my internet goes out, because, don't forget, you don't own your game if you don't have internet to confirm you still own the same game you owned last time you played it.