Re: What is "Critical Commentary"?
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:And why is there a switch to turn it on and off?
Not certain on this but could it be the commentators criticising your performance?
Forum Discussion
9 Replies
@Alastairhufc wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:And why is there a switch to turn it on and off?
Not certain on this but could it be the commentators criticising your performance?
Huh? Surely not? That would be utterly absurd. What kind of fragile fool would that be pandering to?
It must have some other purpose, surely?
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:
@Alastairhufc wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:And why is there a switch to turn it on and off?
Not certain on this but could it be the commentators criticising your performance?
Huh? Surely not? That would be utterly absurd. What kind of fragile fool would that be pandering to?
It must have some other purpose, surely?
The 3 year olds who can legally play the game...
FC's a 3+ game so they have to have child protection features in it
@Alastairhufc wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:
@Alastairhufc wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:And why is there a switch to turn it on and off?
Not certain on this but could it be the commentators criticising your performance?
Huh? Surely not? That would be utterly absurd. What kind of fragile fool would that be pandering to?
It must have some other purpose, surely?
The 3 year olds who can legally play the game...
FC's a 3+ game so they have to have child protection features in it
Why would a 3-year-old need "protection" from a commentator commentating? I have never heard anything so preposterous in my life.
This cannot be what it is, it's beyond ridiculous.
For those who are easily triggered by video game commentary, there's also an option to disable critical commentary. This too can be found in the Audio tab of the settings menu, and, when enabled, will make it so that the commentators don't say things like "Oh. That's a terrible shot" or "What were they thinking?" when a player misses a sitter or gives away possession due to a poor pass or through ball.
That's what I found from a gaming website online.
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:
@Alastairhufc wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:
@Alastairhufc wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:And why is there a switch to turn it on and off?
Not certain on this but could it be the commentators criticising your performance?
Huh? Surely not? That would be utterly absurd. What kind of fragile fool would that be pandering to?
It must have some other purpose, surely?
The 3 year olds who can legally play the game...
FC's a 3+ game so they have to have child protection features in it
Why would a 3-year-old need "protection" from a commentator commentating? I have never heard anything so preposterous in my life.
This cannot be what it is, it's beyond ridiculous.
It's surprising what people get triggered by these days so things are put in place.to give others enjoyment as well, appears some even get triggered by the fact this is an option, now that's ridiculous
@thurlow885 wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:
@Alastairhufc wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:
@Alastairhufc wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:And why is there a switch to turn it on and off?
Not certain on this but could it be the commentators criticising your performance?
Huh? Surely not? That would be utterly absurd. What kind of fragile fool would that be pandering to?
It must have some other purpose, surely?
The 3 year olds who can legally play the game...
FC's a 3+ game so they have to have child protection features in it
Why would a 3-year-old need "protection" from a commentator commentating? I have never heard anything so preposterous in my life.
This cannot be what it is, it's beyond ridiculous.
It's surprising what people get triggered by these days so things are put in place.to give others enjoyment as well, appears some even get triggered by the fact this is an option, now that's ridiculous
I'd like to see a single instance of anyone getting harmed, hurt or injured by commentary on a video game. Just one. No one has ever needed "protection" from a virtual football game commentary. The notion is beyond pathetic and anyone pretending to need a feature like this to disable mild criticism from generic lines of recorded commentary shouldn't be pandered to. They should be told, quite firmly, to get a grip for the sake of humanity.
The endless list of broken things in this game and all the years that people have been begging for simple features that are still not included and THIS is what they are adding? Utterly and completely absurd. It's so ridiculous that I'm still not quite convinced that this is indeed what it means or does. It's "through the looking glass" bizarre. Monty Python level absurd.
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:
@thurlow885 wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:
@Alastairhufc wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:
@Alastairhufc wrote:
@OIIIJazzOIII wrote:And why is there a switch to turn it on and off?
Not certain on this but could it be the commentators criticising your performance?
Huh? Surely not? That would be utterly absurd. What kind of fragile fool would that be pandering to?
It must have some other purpose, surely?
The 3 year olds who can legally play the game...
FC's a 3+ game so they have to have child protection features in it
Why would a 3-year-old need "protection" from a commentator commentating? I have never heard anything so preposterous in my life.
This cannot be what it is, it's beyond ridiculous.
It's surprising what people get triggered by these days so things are put in place.to give others enjoyment as well, appears some even get triggered by the fact this is an option, now that's ridiculous
I'd like to see a single instance of anyone getting harmed, hurt or injured by commentary on a video game. Just one. No one has ever needed "protection" from a virtual football game commentary. The notion is beyond pathetic and anyone pretending to need a feature like this to disable mild criticism from generic lines of recorded commentary shouldn't be pandered to. They should be told, quite firmly, to get a grip for the sake of humanity.
The endless list of broken things in this game and all the years that people have been begging for simple features that are still not included and THIS is what they are adding? Utterly and completely absurd. It's so ridiculous that I'm still not quite convinced that this is indeed what it means or does. It's "through the looking glass" bizarre. Monty Python level absurd.
This is not a new thing, remember seeing it couple years ago definitely last year at least, I noticed it,.chuckled to myself and tbh forgot about it til you brought it up. Dunno why your allowing yourself to get upset over it. Each to there own if someone uses it
I'm not upset. There are no tears. No soggy tissues. I have not needed to phone a friend. I have not reached out to a counsellor and I have not needed any unreasonable protection from a software developer such that has apparently been demonstrated by this "feature".
Your interpretation of being upset is actually a misinterpretation of me asking a question and finding the answer to be so miserably feeble as to be literally unbelievable. This has resulted in one making a point.
Can you honestly tell me with a straight face that you do not find this "feature" laughably ridiculous? If not may I invite you to consider for a moment the cartoon character that it is for and when, or if, you can create the image of that person in your mind's eye then try not to laugh yourself soggy at the thought of such a human being.
The modern world is now beyond satire and parody, I'm afraid.
I do find it hilarious as I said when I first saw it I chuckled to myself then forgot about it and that's that if people are genuinely upset from getting criticism from commentary then that's on them and I'll just leave them be in their little bubble
