Forum Discussion
EA relevant team might draw a conclusion simply by reviewing the result generated by their detection model. I do not think they have really understood the actual situation.
Some players bought and sold those incorrectly displayed cards at prices close to the top, the model therefore believed they violated the rules, but the actual situation is not that simple. For example, if you directly search for Danjuma, the results will display the correct version of Danjuma and many of their prices are normal (about 30,000). However, if you used the search filter and set the GK position and UT birthday rarity, you would see the bug version of Danjuma with a much higher price and a quite limited amount. Players had to spend more coins to buy these bug cards as players had no option to choose cheap ones if they would like to try whether this Danjuma can really play on GK. The market price of BUG CARDS and normal cards are totally DIFFERENT.
I understand that in some cases, the review team may find it difficult to determine whether players are actually participating in coin transfer or if it is unintentional behavior, so they rely solely on the model's judgment. However, the current situation is clearly different. It's a bug in FC24 itself that may have led players to be suspected of these actions. Please take these cases seriously.
About FC 24 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 10 days ago