Why only 12 games for Squad Battles?
WHY? There has to be a $$$ making reason for EA. All I can think of is it gets more people to play online and EA gets a slice of PS online subscriptions? Otherwise it's BS. There are many people...
Forum Discussion
@Born2BWild007It doesn’t matter if you play 12 or 800 you would still get the same rewards.
I could see if people liked playing squad battles but everyone says they hate this game so it would be silly for ea to make anyone play more than 12.
Also it seems like more are playing it now that there is less games so it looks like a positive change. Really no reason to bring back more games.
@Born2BWild007 You are correct, others do not seem to see the logic in what you're saying but I do.
Obviously if the number of games was increased again then less of the people who didn't play before this decrease wouldn't play now, then it would be easier to get the higher ranks for SB players and would result in an increase in rewards for those who favour the mode.
- @ricm0nkey I think people see the logic. It’s just that’s an argument to keep it 12. Just because nobody wants to play 40 games you get better rewards.
That’s literally why people wouldn’t play it before and why more play it now.So screw the casuals, the rich get richer.
I think EA's underlying idea is that this will force the casual SB player to the store, under the misguided idea that they need better players to get higher ranks.
If the majority of casuals are driven away from this game then EA would lose a lot of revenue.
Also by this reckoning they have completely screwed up Rivals by drastically increasing the amount of games required there.
I agree 12 is not enough and it's all about money. I play for the challenge to buios my team using rewards and fifa points in the transfer market. Any one who plays this way will prob not bother with FC26 I know I won't. Also they have the new feature build a club ect but it's all online games I'm fed up with making you buy a game then making it more online it's just GREED.
