Community Manager
I agree dzrtr. I don’t think massive changes are necessarily required, except these phase 2 tokens. It makes things far less unfair if the gaps between the tokens you get for handing in players (113-116 now) are increased. Then picking a 116-117 that you actually want becomes less impossible, and there will be less frustration all around.
Pretty much. Most players hate drafts for a wrong reasons as they dont seem to fully understand the changes. Once P2T gets a proper overhaul with fair cost to reward ratio, it will be fine imo. Until then, it will be mediocre resource exchange process.
dzrtr I respect your perspective and your reasoning, but I can’t quite make sense of why you are cheerleading a revised draft system (and implying those of us who don’t like it just don’t understand it) when neither you, nor EA, have made the case for why the shard system was broken or why the draft system can EVER be an improvement. As I’ve said elsewhere, the threshold question here shouldn’t be whether the draft system can be made less bad than its current crappy state. It should be whether it can be made BETTER than the shard system (which no users were asking to ditch). I would honestly like to hear you (or, better yet, EA) lay out a reasoned explanation for how (specifically) a revised draft system will ever be an improvement (in terms of value/certainty) for users — especially F2Pers. My supposition all along (and I think all the current evidence supports it) is that the draft system was a deliberate effort by EA to claw back value from users and place it behind a paywall. And I think those who support the draft system have a LOT of work to do to build a convincing argument that this conclusion is wrong and that the draft system can be made to deliver equivalent value to the shard system.
