This is from the Federal Trade Commission Website:
SYNOPSIS OF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS CONCERNING
THE SALE OF MERCHANDISE WHICH IS DAMAGED OR DEFECTIVE OR
DIFFERENT FROM THAT ORDERED
The Federal Trade Commission has determined that the following practices involving the
sale of damaged or defective merchandise are unfair or deceptive trade practices and are
unlawful under Section 5😇⚽ of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
‐‐ It is an unfair or deceptive trade practice knowingly to deliver merchandise
which is different from the floor model or sample displayed to the customer at the time of the
purchase. 1/
‐‐ It is an unfair or deceptive trade practice knowingly to represent that
merchandise will be either equal to, or identical to, a sample, when the sample used is superior
in quality or workmanship to merchandise actually delivered. 2/
‐‐ It is an unfair or deceptive trade practice to fail, within a reasonable period of
time, to adequately repair or replace merchandise known to be damaged or defective or to
replace merchandise different from that which the customer ordered, or fail to make other
adjustments within a reasonable period of time in accordance with any promise made to a
purchaser. 3/
‐‐ It is an unfair and deceptive trade practice for a company to misrepresent the
expected delivery date of any merchandise. 4/
‐‐ It is an unfair or deceptive trade practice to advertise in a manner which
misrepresents that the merchandise is new or of good quality, or useable for the purpose
intended. 5/
This is a transcript of Synopsis of Federal Trade Commission Decisions Concerning the
Sale of Merchandise Which is Damaged or Defective or Different from That Ordered.
Typos in the original document appear as bracketed text in the transcript. The transcript
was created April 7, 2022.