@MEGAF1UX wrote:
@EgoMania
a) hmm, perhaps its the fact that you seem to think spending MORE time on a patch is a GOOD idea! its not! this b/s should have been sorted out WEEKS ago!
b) make no mistake, it is "cute". i dont even remember what its like to be a casual gamer.
c) to me self hatred is simply accepting that you got shat on by bioware asif you deserved it.
a) If the choice is between a rushed patch that doesn't fix things properly and/or causes more bugs or one that is solid but takes a bit longer, my vote is for option 2. That doesn't mean I don't recognise the issues that exist but it does mean I believe in quality over speed. The point that it should've been sorted out weeks ago is crying over spilt milk. Complete waste of time.
b) If you call playing 40 hours a week being a casual gamer then you have just won the no-life award and I wish you well with that. It's truly one of the more ridiculous statements made, aside from the fact that I find 150 hours already enough to qualify for playing too long if you really hate it.
c) That is also a form of self-hatred but that doesn't in any way invalidate my definition, so my point stands. It makes zero sense to offer an alternate definition. It's still ridiculous to hate something with such a passion and still play it. Basically you come whining here and then play 100s of hours in game. Do you think that BW will take any of your comments seriously if you talk the talk but don't walk the walk? Actions do speak louder than words.
But do as you will. This will only escalate into a full-fledged forum fight if we go on like this, so I'll bow out at this time and let you have the last word, since that's probably important to you.