Morda isn't friendly to the Pathfinder, and her people are brewing discontent. So why isn't there a quest for us to topple her rule? I want an outpost AND the drive core.

I think Tann should go too. Sure he shows some ability to realize his mistakes, but his choices during the uprising were unforgivable. Given the choice I'd oust Tann, demote Addison so she had no real responsibility, and promote Kesh.

Well if we ever had our way am sure most of our games with have morda, tann and addison kicked out.

@VladVonCastein wrote:Well if we ever had our way am sure most of our games with have morda, tann and addison kicked out.I would not replace Morda or Tann. Sure Morda is a hardass but who can really blame her the way Krogans were treated after the mutiny. She was also willing to trade an outpost for the drive core which suggest that you can negotiate with her. Finally she started the liberation of females from the old ways where they were kept essentially as birth machines in their own camps.Tann is your run of the mill bureaucrat replacing him with another would be pointless.Addison on the other hand are clearly incompetent. Her excuse for not firing Spender before was that she was too busy running colonial affairs. Too busy with what? Before I arrived there had only been two failed attempts to create an outpost.

@jpkarlsen wrote:I would not replace Morda or Tann. Sure Morda is a hardass but who can really blame her the way Krogans were treated after the mutiny. She was also willing to trade an outpost for the drive core which suggest that you can negotiate with her. Finally she started the liberation of females from the old ways where they were kept essentially as birth machines in their own camps.Tann is your run of the mill bureaucrat replacing him with another would be pointless.Addison on the other hand are clearly incompetent. Her excuse for not firing Spender before was that she was too busy running colonial affairs. Too busy with what? Before I arrived there had only been two failed attempts to create an outpost.I wont blame Morda if she's a krogan scout, being a leader is different, in my opinion a leader of a nation/people should have at least some levels of diplomacy and empathy. I would agree that negotiation is possible if she come to the negotiating table when Ryder first visited her, not after realising that he has the drive core. At that stage that was her only option. During my playthroughs I have always collaborated and given her the drive core, but deep down inside am always a little wary if she will one day be trigger happy and end up in a war with the krogan. As for Tann, my thoughts are similar to EA David's comment on the uprising, plus he's a proven racist, well not so much a race but a species in this case. If I have my way I would put both him and addisson on trial for incompetence, gross negligence which directly or indirectly caused the deaths of many.

Drack likes Morda for some reason, so does Kesh. They may say bad things about her but have never said to get rid of her. There must be something more going on. We really didn't get enough information on how the colony is being run or how their society is adjusting. We do get hints that the younger Krogan are more peaceful and forward thinking. It would be great if Ryder could at the very least spar with Morda. I also think the Krogan and Salarians are going to come to blows in Andromeda. There is too much hatred there.Who is set to replace Tann? I think Tann and Addison did horrible things and will still continue to do them. I wish we had more information on how the AI actually works. Were the planets going to be one species only? Was the human planet to benefit only humans? We know Ryder will have to be based out of Meridian because SAM node is there. Meridian is technically a human planet so who actually gets to say who lives there? Does that mean the Alliance will have control of Meridian if they survived? Sorry, tangent. I think everyone is so worried with survival that bad deeds are being overlooked. But as long as they are in survival mode, pathfinders are in charge.

Can we topple Morda's rule? | EA Forums

11 Replies

fudgietroll
9 years ago
@chrissyce1123 wrote:
Drack likes Morda for some reason, so does Kesh. They may say bad things about her but have never said to get rid of her. There must be something more going on. We really didn't get enough information on how the colony is being run or how their society is adjusting. We do get hints that the younger Krogan are more peaceful and forward thinking. It would be great if Ryder could at the very least spar with Morda. I also think the Krogan and Salarians are going to come to blows in Andromeda. There is too much hatred there.
Who is set to replace Tann? I think Tann and Addison did horrible things and will still continue to do them. I wish we had more information on how the AI actually works. Were the planets going to be one species only? Was the human planet to benefit only humans? We know Ryder will have to be based out of Meridian because SAM node is there. Meridian is technically a human planet so who actually gets to say who lives there? Does that mean the Alliance will have control of Meridian if they survived? Sorry, tangent. I think everyone is so worried with survival that bad deeds are being overlooked. But as long as they are in survival mode, pathfinders are in charge.
No, Nexus Council, Morda, and Sloane/Reyes are still in charge, but the Pathfinders, especially first among equals Ryder, do have a huge amount of power
I think it is probable we will see more internal conflict in the MW settlers/Anti-Kett Allies. Have you read the Browncoats thread?

Forum Discussion

Can we topple Morda's rule?

11 Replies

About Mass Effect Franchise Discussion

Recent Discussions

Mass Effect 3 Galaxy At War Load Failed

Mass Effect 3 Load Failed. Cannot connect to server

ME3 Multiplayer progress lost after migrating to EA App

ME3 multiplayer randomly crashes

BUG - Mass Effect 3 Shields not Recharging when playing at high frame rate.