i don't recall any of that being stated anywhere. are you sure you're not just making assumptions that back up your point of view?
---edit
besides the advent not being against initiative part. i do remember that.
---edit
iirc, at prodromos they say that there's massive seismic activity and it's altered the underground landscape.
Yes, I am quite sure. You can easily check for Yourself - there are dozens of gameplays on Youtube, just check for "Andromeda Making an impression", e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eeBF2LbERk
Hainly Abrams: Eos has massive underground rivers we can't tap. But altering those tremors just right might crack the ground for irrigation.
Then in the place where Ryder is to use the last seismic hammer...
Advent Scout: We didn't come to Andromeda to fuel Director Tann's regime. In Advent, we're free citizens. (...) Ha, I should get you a passport for our capital. Maybe when the showers work again. Our water table dropped recently, like the rivers ground were running dry. We tracked the problem out here.
Ryder: There's been seismic activity. We're using that and a survey hammer to tap the rivers.
Scout: Oh, sh**. Advent needs that water supply to stay independent. Would you... consider a deal? Our survey showed a massive natural gas deposit nearby. Your hammer taps that instead, we mine the gas, and trade it to your outpost. Everyone wins. (...) Look, I can't argue with your guns. Just remember there's a lot of citizens downstream.
@Kondaru i'll check for myself as i don't recall the convo going like that. but if it's right. i'll have to concur. though i still think tapping the gas veins is still an environmental issue.
---edit
you're right, i'm wrong. though you still have to choose between: advent/prodromos & the environment. i happen to think siding with prodromos is the right call in this situation. you don't. that's it.
@CasperTheLich wrote:@Kondaru i'll check for myself as i don't recall the convo going like that. but if it's right. i'll have to concur. though i still think tapping the gas veins is still an environmental issue.
---edit
you're right, i'm wrong. though you still have to choose between: advent/prodromos & the environment. i happen to think siding with prodromos is the right call in this situation. you don't. that's it.
A few things to keep in mind about the gas issue. One, most planets have a "carrying capacity", essentially what it can absorb and support. Even if we dump all of the Initiative on Eos that is only around 100k people. Add in the methane and you are still well below pollutant levels produced at any time in Earth's history. Even on pre-Columbian North America there was more people and methane production (considering that there were an estimated 60 million buffalo alone) than on Eos, granted that Eos probably does currently have less vegetation that North America at the time as well
Second, Eos does have incredible terraforming capabilities running, which should more than cover any emissions produced.
Third, we don't know exactly how planets work, so human produced greenhouse gasses may or may not override standard planetary cycles
Anyway, I decided to help out Advent, so I stay on good terms with both!🙂
@CasperTheLich wrote:@Kondaru i'll check for myself as i don't recall the convo going like that. but if it's right. i'll have to concur. though i still think tapping the gas veins is still an environmental issue.
---edit
you're right, i'm wrong. though you still have to choose between: advent/prodromos & the environment. i happen to think siding with prodromos is the right call in this situation. you don't. that's it.
Yeah, I also chose for Prodromos, well actually for the planet. The whole point of the game is to make planets viable and a big part of that is reawakening the remnant vaults to make the planet better again. Environmental issues are the last thing I would want to stack on that, especially for people who signed up for the Initiative and took off when it got tough. Now they want to benefit from the Initiative?
Of course in the end it makes no difference in game but they did survive without that gas, so I didn't buy the urgency for them either.
@EgoMania wrote:
@CasperTheLich wrote:@Kondaru i'll check for myself as i don't recall the convo going like that. but if it's right. i'll have to concur. though i still think tapping the gas veins is still an environmental issue.
---edit
you're right, i'm wrong. though you still have to choose between: advent/prodromos & the environment. i happen to think siding with prodromos is the right call in this situation. you don't. that's it.
Yeah, I also chose for Prodromos, well actually for the planet. The whole point of the game is to make planets viable and a big part of that is reawakening the remnant vaults to make the planet better again. Environmental issues are the last thing I would want to stack on that, especially for people who signed up for the Initiative and took off when it got tough. Now they want to benefit from the Initiative?
Of course in the end it makes no difference in game but they did survive without that gas, so I didn't buy the urgency for them either.
They wanted the underground water and were willing to give you the natural gas location. They did mention selling the water to Podromos later, but fie on that.
@arthurh3535 wrote:
@EgoMania wrote:
@CasperTheLich wrote:@Kondaru i'll check for myself as i don't recall the convo going like that. but if it's right. i'll have to concur. though i still think tapping the gas veins is still an environmental issue.
---edit
you're right, i'm wrong. though you still have to choose between: advent/prodromos & the environment. i happen to think siding with prodromos is the right call in this situation. you don't. that's it.
Yeah, I also chose for Prodromos, well actually for the planet. The whole point of the game is to make planets viable and a big part of that is reawakening the remnant vaults to make the planet better again. Environmental issues are the last thing I would want to stack on that, especially for people who signed up for the Initiative and took off when it got tough. Now they want to benefit from the Initiative?
Of course in the end it makes no difference in game but they did survive without that gas, so I didn't buy the urgency for them either.
They wanted the underground water and were willing to give you the natural gas location. They did mention selling the water to Podromos later, but fie on that.
Well, regardless of the details, there was an environmental issue of some signficance to consider and I was not prepared to let that happen just so these runaways could benefit from it.
@EgoMania wrote:
@arthurh3535 wrote:
@EgoMania wrote:
@CasperTheLich wrote:@Kondaru i'll check for myself as i don't recall the convo going like that. but if it's right. i'll have to concur. though i still think tapping the gas veins is still an environmental issue.
---edit
you're right, i'm wrong. though you still have to choose between: advent/prodromos & the environment. i happen to think siding with prodromos is the right call in this situation. you don't. that's it.
Yeah, I also chose for Prodromos, well actually for the planet. The whole point of the game is to make planets viable and a big part of that is reawakening the remnant vaults to make the planet better again. Environmental issues are the last thing I would want to stack on that, especially for people who signed up for the Initiative and took off when it got tough. Now they want to benefit from the Initiative?
Of course in the end it makes no difference in game but they did survive without that gas, so I didn't buy the urgency for them either.
They wanted the underground water and were willing to give you the natural gas location. They did mention selling the water to Podromos later, but fie on that.
Well, regardless of the details, there was an environmental issue of some signficance to consider and I was not prepared to let that happen just so these runaways could benefit from it.
Well, you just stole all their water. They now have to A) go belly up and surrender to Tann, or B) go take their water back. These guys seem the militantly independent types, so, congratulations, you just started a war. I see this as detrimental to the planet, especially since it sounds like Advent was doing ok before the vault got fixed and would therefor not suffer too much if they took out the towers and let the radiation come back. Don't know if they would go that far, but they could, or hit Prodromos hard, etc. Finally, if I am interpreting what the Advent guys are telling you correctly, they aren't actually exiles, but are a bunch of Nexus people who have left to form their own colony, like New Tuchanka, but may still be on the Nexus' books, like PeeBee or Clancy.
@fudgietroll wrote:
Well, you just stole all their water. They now have to A) go belly up and surrender to Tann, or B) go take their water back. These guys seem the militantly independent types, so, congratulations, you just started a war. I see this as detrimental to the planet, especially since it sounds like Advent was doing ok before the vault got fixed and would therefor not suffer too much if they took out the towers and let the radiation come back. Don't know if they would go that far, but they could, or hit Prodromos hard, etc. Finally, if I am interpreting what the Advent guys are telling you correctly, they aren't actually exiles, but are a bunch of Nexus people who have left to form their own colony, like New Tuchanka, but may still be on the Nexus' books, like PeeBee or Clancy.
We didn't steal anything. Both groups were prospecting (and a lot closer to Podromos than Advent is). He pretty much admits that if you weren't heavily armed, they'd probably try to make a move on you and force you out and take the resource. A resource that may end being critical to your first colony's success.
You are under no obligation to make it so that they do not have to trade with Nexus.
So really, it becomes a matter of which is more important: Your colonists? Or Exiles that have already turned their back on you.
@arthurh3535 wrote:
@fudgietroll wrote:
Well, you just stole all their water. They now have to A) go belly up and surrender to Tann, or B) go take their water back. These guys seem the militantly independent types, so, congratulations, you just started a war. I see this as detrimental to the planet, especially since it sounds like Advent was doing ok before the vault got fixed and would therefor not suffer too much if they took out the towers and let the radiation come back. Don't know if they would go that far, but they could, or hit Prodromos hard, etc. Finally, if I am interpreting what the Advent guys are telling you correctly, they aren't actually exiles, but are a bunch of Nexus people who have left to form their own colony, like New Tuchanka, but may still be on the Nexus' books, like PeeBee or Clancy.We didn't steal anything. Both groups were prospecting (and a lot closer to Podromos than Advent is). He pretty much admits that if you weren't heavily armed, they'd probably try to make a move on you and force you out and take the resource. A resource that may end being critical to your first colony's success.
You are under no obligation to make it so that they do not have to trade with Nexus.
So really, it becomes a matter of which is more important: Your colonists? Or Exiles that have already turned their back on you.
Advent didn't turn their backs on ME, just Tann/Initiative, which I can't blame them for really. I got a personal invite to go hang out some time. I would also like to point out that I don't get to choose between Advent and the Initiative, I get to choose between giving the Initiative ALL of the resources or helping two cities, preventing a war, and getting slapped with a Greenpeace citation. If I had the option to back Advent exclusively I might consider it. Anyway, Exiles got kicked out of the Initiative, while other groups, such as the Krogan, left voluntarily, and are treated differently by most (though not Tann). It seems that Advent was one of these groups.
We don't actually know how far away Advent is. Anyway, they had the water, we took the water they had, now they have no water. Sounds a lot like stealing, or claim-jumping if you prefer, which is generally considered a hanging offence. The fact that you have more firepower than their small scouting party doesn't mean that you have the right to steal their stuff, which they had been using and had (once again) gotten to first.
