Forum Discussion
draconiam
4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@Mrgaby95 There was a space for the original endings but knowing Bioware today they had two years out of three plus a multiplayer component to add to the third game to booth, they cahnged some things for the first and second games so why was the third game ignored? No credits import bonus, no weapons and armor import bonus, all that research on the Normandy SR-2 was left without meaning (except three Normandy upgrades) and the N7 missions don't have much of an impact (finding Prothean ruins and other things) unlike most of ME1 side quests. For me it's a 7/10 not because the LE is bad but because they had nearly 10 years to fix those issues and chose to give a near perfect remaster.
4 years ago
@draconiamyou heave a point but maybe they did not wan't to change too much, it was a possible risk of getting hate for a too big of a change, but i heave to say i wanted a little more, like fixing old problems, for example the ! icon that still show up after a side quest is finished on the map of planets in me 1 and other small stuff that are important in there own way to perfection. 1 thing i would heave loved to see them doing a better job is how the ME 1 characters look, like anderson and others like him.
- draconiam4 years agoSeasoned Ace@Mrgaby95 They changed a lot in ME1 to the point I would say 75% of the fixes went to that game while 25% went to the second game development. In both cases dialog bugs and other things got fixed but when it came time for the third game dialog bugs and more they let it alone.
- holger14054 years agoHero+
I don't know if you numbers are accurate or not, but the Ash conversation you mentioned is not a "dialog bug". It was never part of the released game and therefore is also not part of the Remastered game.
- draconiam4 years agoSeasoned Ace@holger1405 Modders differ from that assertion, they fixed those lines in the original release on their own.