Forum Discussion
Just calling it like I and so many others see it. SP 'patching' have ignored a lot of the big bugs people have had. Adding a romance option and making it so you can change your appearance later in the game etc. is not really a patch. Not to mention that every new patch that comes out introduces new bugs for people. As I said, it is what it is and the article points out why the game gets barely above a 4 average from users on metacritic. You don't like my opinion? Move on.
I have no problem with your opinion, do you have one with my mine?
Still, I like facts, and fact is that the game got as many patches for SP as for MP.
- 8 years ago
Youtube vid of an interview with the kotaku writer of the MEA article.
- 8 years ago
@VladVonCastein wrote:Youtube vid of an interview with the kotaku writer of the MEA article.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DujrzCMKcug
And yet again, no other source or collaboration from another news source. While I'm not going to say it didn't have any problems, we got a good game that is playable and that the developers are still working on with patches.
The true disasters of game studios are the ones that are 10+ years in the making with three different companies worth of work and restarts.
- ApprovedAnonymous8 years ago
So your opinion is simply that because kokatu wrote it, it must therefore be wrong.
Bioware will NEVER tell you the truth behind why the game was so badly mismanaged.
No company ever does that. In order to find the truth you either need a public enquiry or a journalist.
And a public enquiry usually only gives you a different kind of truth.