DBacon123 wrote:I appreciate the explanation of what you think went wrong, but it really doesn't matter
That's a very collaborative approach to feedback!
DBacon123 wrote:The cpu defensemen simply lacks the speed to keep up.
To keep up AFTER a galringly obvious mistake by the offense to be behind all 3 opponents...
DBacon123 wrote:but when he's skating down the ice, the speed difference is the obvious factor.
Because he's back skating and the other players are skating forward....
DBacon123 wrote:The cpu defenseman simply can't keep up.
Finish that sentence though..... "Can't keep up after a glaringly obvious O-Zone mistake by the forwards"
DBacon123 wrote:The AI gives up positional advantage by making nonsensical lateral movements
Nonsensical? My dude... there's 3 players skating him down.
DBacon123 wrote:The AI does not have the speed to keep up with the attacking players
.... after a glaringly obvious mistake by the forwards, yes.
DBacon123 wrote:The AI had a 30-40 foot headstart back to the defensive zone
Skating backwards
DBacon123 wrote:got torched by their straight line speed.
That they were able to generate due to a glaring mistake by the offense, allowing them to generate straight line speed through the neutral zone completely unimpeded.
Like I said before, it's not perfect. I'm not saying you're wrong exactly. But in the name of pure balance, you refusing to acknowledge how your offensive play contributed to their goal is only a disservice. I also actually think my feedback and everyone else's here matters very much.