SMUGPRIZE CORNER๐
If you have performed a feat of gameplay that makes you feel Smug then you may be awarded one of the many Smugprize awards on offer.
What's left so far:
๐๐๐๐๐
Forum Discussion
502 Replies
PROVE IT.
?=๐ฐ,๐ฐ,๐ฐ๐ฐ,๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ,๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ,๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ
@linuxPigPen I thought you were gonna say Easter eggs..... ๐ฟ
Filus Bunny-ci clearly knew nothing about rabbits.
How can you start with one rabbit๐ฐ?
You clearly need to start at ๐ฐ๐ฐ if he knew anything about rabbits.
And they would have to be one male rabbit๐ฐ and one female rabbit๐ฐ and not two male or two female rabbits๐ฐ๐ฐ.
Clearly i deserve a Noble Prize for Mathematics for debunking this piffle.
๐ฐ๐ ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฐ
I nearly sprayed out my tea as well.....
@MAGICDAVESHROOMAh, sir, not so. There are numerous scholarly articles about rabbits being the only mammal capable of reproducing by parthenogenesis.
And I hypothesize it would br easier to start with 1 rabbit than zero rabbits.
QED
(Which stands for Quite Easily Done.)
@linuxPigPen wrote:@MAGICDAVESHROOMAh, sir, not so. There are numerous scholarly articles about rabbits being the only mammal capable of reproducing by parthenogenesis.
And I hypothesize it would br easier to start with 1 rabbit than zero rabbits.
QED
(Which stands for Quite Easily Done.)
Sir, i refute your comment as incorrect.
Filus bunny-ci was born long before 1936 which is when parthenogenesis was proved to be possible in bunnies.
And i am still waiting for any actual proof you may have of where the mythical first (or even pair of) bunnies come from.
You can't claim cloning bunny number one either.
๐=๐ฐ๐ฐNO
EDIT; Quo est demonstratum
- @MAGICDAVESHROOM Sir, I refute the first part of your argument by offering an analogous situation. Electricity was proven in the 1700s by the likes of Farraday, Lavoisier and Franklin. Following the reasoning of your argument therefore, electricity could not have occurred before it was discovered by humans. Is this the thrust of your argument, sir, that until something is quantified and described by humans, it cannot possibly exist?
Perhaps to explain the first bunny we need to return to gooseneck barnacles and their remarkable ability to spontaneously generate? 1 bunny = 2 bunnies?
Give this to EA, they can make this happen -- track record from the resource doubling bug.
This conversion reminds me of an article I recently read: "56 Percent Of Americans Don't Think We Should Teach Arabic Numerals In School"
Sir, we are not discussing the discovery of electricity but the creation of one or possibly two bunnies from nothingness.
Clearly electricity already existed before anyone stuck their fingers into a socket and got a shock.
I still await your proof of how bunnies were created from nothingness with interest as i understand Lavoisier states that "MATTER CAN NEITHER BE CREATED NOR DESTROYED" .
Could i please be nominated for Nobel prizes in Mathematics, Cuniculture, Genetics and Sciencey stuff?
๐ฐ๐ ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฐ
EDIT: Perhaps to explain the first bunny we need to return to gooseneck barnacles and their remarkable ability to spontaneously generate?
That is a direct quote from you and perhaps you could explain where the FIRST gooseneck barnacle came from?
It had to come from somewhere?
Featured Places
