Forum Discussion

Re: What's worse? Afkers or menu sitters?

For me it's menu sitters. Especially bad in later stages of GA where I have seen 8 to 10+ people camping the menu. If those players were actually playing then a win might happen.

However neither are worse than teams that camp the package in strike. Completely game breaking.

3 Replies

  • People waiting in the menu are worse 

     Afk players  will always disappear afterwards 

    But what's more irritating is a Hero who doesn't play the objective 

    Just then I played a game of supremacy on Yavin 4 as the Rebels

    Someone got Han solo and stayed at the start of the map shooting the whole time and moving forward not quite to the crossroad In  front

    But when the opposite side turns up than ran back to the start and shot from there

    This player was a lv 39 solo

    We just lost the game

  • AFK timers in this game are too short nowadays, and AFK farming is pointless for months. I never play bigger modes, so menu sitters are irrelevant to me, but in a contest, menu sitters are definitely worse nowadays. However, AFKers were a major nuisance at one point in the history of this game.

About STAR WARS™ Battlefront™ II

Official community forums for Star Wars™ Battlefront II™ discussions.17,281 PostsLatest Activity: 10 hours ago