Full disclosure: I find 3v3 stupid.In 3v3 you usually build team from the typical meta teams at 5v5 but then the two toons that are left out are usually useless (exceptions exists such as NS, and Revan/Bastilla).For example, I have 10 resistance toons at g12 (poor Rose) and can only use 6 of them because of synergy or lack of leader (I can’t find a leader for R2 and 3PO among my Rebels). Solo’s smugglers is the same thing: all the prepared squad at G12, but Vandor, Han and Lando are out because the team would be too slow and the three of them don’t have a leader to support them.Please consider reducing the pace of 3v3 because it is infuriating to me that most of my teams and investment are just cut.

I find it refreshing. I think it's boring seeing the same FO team, NS team, Jedi Team, Empire team whatever it is in every single game mode there is.3v3 gives us a new use of the rarely used characters. And a new perspective and ability to theorycraft. Just check out Urzatrons streams. That guys finds a use for Lobot of all toons. no other game mode allows that to happen. If you want 5v5 literally play anything else TW Arena, TB. It's not a waste of investment it's a new fresh use of your investments**edit spelling

Can’t find a team for c3po or r2d2......lol

Love 3v3,it requires more planning than a regular 5v5 since it's a new game mode for everyone

3v3 literally destroys 40% of our investment

Alijar1
6 years ago
3v3 lets me use Tuskens without having to add in another character
Darth_DeVito
6 years ago
I like the reduced squad size, but I hate that I can't use more of my roster. 3v3 should allow us to place twice as many defensive teams. Otherwise people with a deep roster are at an even greater disadvantage than usual.
GloriousDon
6 years ago
3v3 5v5
GA / TW

Are so fun, they should be ran continuously.
Nyanperor
6 years ago
As a player with a rather weak roster, I find 3v3 useful given how few decently geared and leveled toons I actually have. I can see it being annoying if you're well geared and leveled and such, but when you only have 2-3 mediocre 5 man squads it's nice to have the extra wiggle room.
ninjachronicles
6 years ago
You know, you don't NEED a character with a leader ability to make a good team ?
Neo2551
6 years ago
"Lonit;c-1785573" wrote:
"Neo2551;d-196462" wrote:
Full disclosure: I find 3v3 stupid.

In 3v3 you usually build team from the typical meta teams at 5v5 but then the two toons that are left out are usually useless (exceptions exists such as NS, and Revan/Bastilla).

For example, I have 10 resistance toons at g12 (poor Rose) and can only use 6 of them because of synergy or lack of leader (I can’t find a leader for R2 and 3PO among my Rebels). Solo’s smugglers is the same thing: all the prepared squad at G12, but Vandor, Han and Lando are out because the team would be too slow and the three of them don’t have a leader to support them.

Please consider reducing the pace of 3v3 because it is infuriating to me that most of my teams and investment are just cut.

dont like dont play it

I like the rewards though :)
Neo2551
6 years ago
"Vos_Landeck;c-1785611" wrote:
Well, the game isn't personally catered to specific players. A lot of people love 3 vs. 3. It rewards people who have built deeper rosters and gives people a chance to use characters that never make the cut for the 5 character teams.

I have 74 G12 and 33 G11 with 58 zetas, looks it is not deep enough for me to enjoy the game ...
Acidwormss
6 years ago
I'm boycotting 3v3. It has no place in this game. No other game mode for 3v3 to try anything. Characters are designed for 5v5 , not 3v3. Many great 5v5 teams are terrible in 3v3. They should limit it to 5v5 or perhaps try more than 5 in a team or something else to give us a different look, but lowering to teams of 3 was a terrible decision in my opinion. I boycotted last time, and this time, I am losing on teams I can beat easily in 5v5 so back to boycotting.

Please remove 3v3 from the game CG.
Scruminator
Seasoned Newcomer
6 years ago
"Mzee;c-1786711" wrote:
I'm boycotting 3v3. It has no place in this game. No other game mode for 3v3 to try anything. Characters are designed for 5v5 , not 3v3. Many great 5v5 teams are terrible in 3v3. They should limit it to 5v5 or perhaps try more than 5 in a team or something else to give us a different look, but lowering to teams of 3 was a terrible decision in my opinion. I boycotted last time, and this time, I am losing on teams I can beat easily in 5v5 so back to boycotting.

Please remove 3v3 from the game CG.

Go ahead and boycott it ??‍♂️
Hoberfinkle
6 years ago
"Nikoms565;c-1786818" wrote:
The squad synergies, leadership abilities, etc. were clearly designed, "tested" and "balanced" for 5 v.5.

3v3 just feels like a weak (and not very good) attempt to make things "fresh".... without CG actually doing anything content-wise to truly make things more engaging.

If this were a poll, my vote would be for 5v5, all the time.

what about the team literally called the "sith triumvirate".

yeah, not the best argument, but I don't think the characters were created for specifically 5v5 teams. looking at the crazy synergies between characters like death trooper and krenic are a good example of toons created for just one other toon.

3v3 is a new way of approaching the game rather than the same old thing over and over and over and over again.